期刊文献+

动力P-Δ效应对地震力调整系数的影响 被引量:18

Dynamic P-Δ effects on seismic force modification factors
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析了动力P-△效应和结构抗侧强度对结构动力稳定的影响.利用单自由度(SDOF)体系弹塑性动力时程分析程序,分别对反向加载时刚度退化的修正克拉夫滞回模型(MC)和理想弹塑性(EPP)模型,计算了4类场地下各74~106条地震波输入后的结构动力响应,其中结构自振周期为0.1~6.0/s,延性取为2、3、4、5和6,二阶效应系数为0.025~0.100,得到了不考虑和考虑P-△效应的地震力调整系数,并计算了两者间的比值谱S,提出了S谱的简化计算公式,用以分析P-△效应对地震力调整系数的影响.结果表明,标准化周期、延性和二阶效应系数对S谱均有影响;不同滞回模型对动力P-△效应的敏感性是不同的,理想弹塑性模型为保持常延性而需增加的抗侧强度要大于修正克拉夫滞回模型. The influence of dynamic P-△ effects and lateral strength on structure stability were investigated. Based on elastic-plastic time-history earthquake analysis of single degree of freedom system (SDOF), the seismic force modification factors without and with P-A effects for modified-Clough(MC) model and elastic perfectly-plastic (EPP) model were investigated. A total of 370 earthquake records belonging to 4 site and soil conditions with each containing 74 to 106 records were used to calculate the structure response. The structure periods varied form 0.1 to 6 s and the ductility was taken to be 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Stability index of 0.025 to 0. 100 was used in the analysis. The ratio spectra S were constructed to analyze the influence of P-△ effects on seismic force modification factors. The S spectra depend on the normalized periods, stability index and ductility. It was found that different SDOF systems with different hysteretic models have different sensitivity to P-△ effects. The increase in strength required to maintain constant ductility in the presence of P-△ effects for EPP model is more than that of modified-Clough model. Formulae of S spectra for modified-Clough and EPP models were proposed.
出处 《浙江大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第1期120-125,192,共7页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science
关键词 抗震设计 地震力调整系数 滞回模型 P-△效应 延性 seismic design seismic force modification factor hysteretic models P-△ effect ductility
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Seismology Committee of Structural Engineers Association of California. SEAOC blue book, Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary [S]. Sacramento, California: SEAOC, 1996.
  • 2中国工程建设标准化协会.CECS1602004建筑工程抗震性态设计通则(试用)[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2004.
  • 3Building Seismic Safety Council. FEMA450 Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures Partl: Provisions [S]. Washington DC: Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, 2003.
  • 4ROSENBLUETH E. Slenderness effects in buildings[J]. Journal of Structures Division, ASCE, 1965, 91(1):229-252.
  • 5BERNAL D. Amplification factors for inelastic dynamic P-△ effects in earthquake analysis [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1987, 15:635 - 551.
  • 6BERNAL D, Instability of buildings during seismic response [J]. Engineering Structures, 1998,20:496 - 502.
  • 7HANS W, KWON 0 S, LEE L H. Investigating of dynamic P-A effect on ductility factor [J]. Structures Engineering and Mechanics, 2001,12(3): 249 - 266.
  • 8International Code Council. Uniform Building Code 1997[S]. California: International Conference of Building Officials, 1997.
  • 9European committee for standardization. Eurcode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance [S]. Brussels: CEN, 2003.
  • 10TONG G S, HUANG J Q. Seismic force modification factors for Structures [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University.SCIENCE, 2005, 6A(8):813-825,

同被引文献199

引证文献18

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部