期刊文献+

基于近地高光谱棉花生物量遥感估算模型 被引量:26

Estimation Models of Cotton Aboveground Fresh Biomass Based on Field Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析棉花地上鲜生物量冠层高光谱反射率变异系数,反射率光谱、一阶微分光谱与地上鲜生物量相关关系的结果表明:在可见光近红外波段,棉花冠层反射率光谱变异系数在672nm波段处最大;棉花地上鲜生物量与反射率光谱相关系数最大值在可见光波段出现在589~700nm,在近红外波段出现在865.919nm波段,且前者大于后者。地上鲜生物量与一阶微分光谱相关系数在可见光波段出现524~528nm、552~588nm、710—755nm3个高值区。基于以上研究,选择19个高光谱特征参数建立了棉花地上鲜生物量高光谱遥感监测模型,经检验,单波段中以F629估算水平最高,估算模型为Y=9.7914exp(-20.738F629),准确度为83.9%,RMSE为0.64kgm^-2,预测值与实测值相关系数为0.940^**;组合参数以[629,901]指数形式估算模型估算水平最高,模型为Y=0.0986exp(4.3696[629-901]),准确度达84.0%,RMSE为0.55kgm^-2,预测值与实测值相关系数为0.960^**,上述两个模型为参选模型中估算棉花地上鲜生物量最佳高光谱估算模型。 Aboveground fresh biomass is an important colony qualitative index of cotton, and so it is important for production management and yield estimation in cotton to establish the monitoring model based on hyperspectral parameter. The wavelength variation coefficient of cotton canopy hyperspectrum on aboveground fresh biomass and the correlation between the aboveground fresh biomass and reflective spectrum, the first derivative spectrum showed that the biggest value of hyperspectral variation coefficient of cotton canopy reflectance in the visible light region was in 672 nm. The biggest value of correlation coefficient between the aboveground fresh biomass and reflectance spectrum at the visible light region was in 589-700 nm and at the near infrared red region in 865-919 nm, and the former was larger than latter. The correlation coefficient between the aboveground fresh biomass and the first derivative value in the visible light had three high-value areas including 524-528 nm, 552-588 nm and 710-755 nm. According to the analysis above, the nineteen hyperspectral characteristic parameters were used to establish the hyperspectral remote sensing estimation models of the aboveground fresh biomass in cotton. The tested result of models expressed the parameters veracity of estimating the aboveground fresh biomass in cotton, including reflectance of 682 nm and 629 nm and the combination forms, was up 80%. Among them, F629 [ Y = 9.7914 exp( -20.738 F629)] in single band reflectance parameters was better, its veracity reached to 83.9 %, RMSE was 0. 64 kg m^-2, and the correlation coefficient between the estimated value and measured value was 0.94^** ; The monitoring model of [629, 901] [ Y = 0.0986 exp(4.3696 [629, 901])] was best, and its veracity reached to 84.0 %, RMSE was 0. 55 kg m^-2, and the correlation coefficient between the estimated value and measured value was 0.96^** , the two models above were the best among the elected models estimating cotton aboveground fresh biomass.
出处 《作物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期311-316,共6页 Acta Agronomica Sinica
基金 新疆生产建设兵团博士基金项目(2003-05) 新疆生产建设兵团绿洲生态农业重点实验室放课题项目
关键词 棉花 地上鲜生物量 高光谱遥感 估算模型 Cotton Aboveround fresh biomass Hyperspectral remote sensing Estimation models
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Lobell D B,Hicke J A,Asner G P,Field C B,Tucker C J,Los S O.Satellite estimates of productivity and light use efficiency in Unite States agricultural,1982-98.Global Change Biol,2002,(8):722-735
  • 2Seaquist J W,Olsson L,Ard (O)J.A remote sensing-based primary production model for grassland biomes.Ecol Modeling,2003,169:131-155
  • 3Zheng D L,Rademacher J,Chen J Q,Crow T,Bresee M,Moine J L,Ryu S R.Estimating aboveground biomass using Landsat 7 ETM+ data across a managed landscape in northern Wisconsin,USA.Remote Sens Environ,2004,93:402-411
  • 4Rahman A F,Gamon J A.Detecting biophysical properties of a semi-arid grassland and distinguishing burned from unburned areas with hyperspectral reflectance.J Arid Environ,2004,58,597-610
  • 5AlBakri J T,Taylor J C.Application of NOAA AVHRR for monitoring veget ation conditions and biomass in Jordan.J Arid Environ,2003,54:579-593
  • 6傅玮东,刘绍民,黄敬峰.冬小麦生物量遥感监测模型的研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,1997,11(1):84-89. 被引量:25
  • 7杨存建,刘纪远,骆剑承.不同龄组的热带森林植被生物量与遥感地学数据之间的相关性分析[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(6):862-867. 被引量:16
  • 8Mutang O,Skidmore A K.Hyperspectral and depth analysis for a better estimation of grass biomass (Cenchrus ciliaris) measured under controlled laboratory conditions.Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinf,2004,(5):87-96
  • 9Van Der Meer F.Analysis of spectral absorption features in hype rspectral imager.Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinf,2004,(5):55-68
  • 10Hansena P M,Schjoerring J K.Reflectance measurement of canopy biomass and nitrogen status in wheat crops using normalized difference vegetation indices and partial least squares regression.Remote Sens Environ,2003,86:542-553

二级参考文献105

  • 1金仲辉,张建军.由光谱反射率估算玉米植冠的APAR[J].北京农业大学学报,1994,20(1):47-51. 被引量:6
  • 2白宝璋 王景.植物生理学测试技术[M].北京:中国科学出版社,1993..
  • 3刘祖贵 中国农业工程学会 等.不同滴灌水量对棉花生长发育及产量的影响.农业高效用水与水土环境保护[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,2000.261-265.
  • 4刘海启 裴志远 张松岭 等.中巴地球资源一号卫星CCD图像农业应用评价[A]..数据中巴地球资源卫星数据应用评价文集[C].国防科工委系统工程一司,2000..
  • 5中国科学院新疆资源开发综合考察队.新疆植棉业[R].,1994..
  • 6徐德源.新疆农业气候资源及区划[R].,1989..
  • 7王秀珍.The study on spectral remote sensing estimation models about bio-physical and bio-chemical parameters of rice[M].Zhejiang University PhD Degree Thesis,.46-52.
  • 8Shibayama M, Akiyama T. Seasonal visible, near-infrared and mid-infrared spectra of rice canopies in relation to LAI and aboveground dry phytomass [ J ]. Remote Sens Environ, 1989,27 : 119 - 127.
  • 9Gausman H W, Alien W A, Cardenas R, et al. Relation of light reflectance to histological and physical evaluations of cotton leaf maturity[J]. Appl Optics, 1970,9:545 - 552.
  • 10Card D H,Peterson D L,Matson P A,et al. Prediction of leaf chemistry by the use of visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy [ J ]. Remote Sens Environ, 1988,26 : 123 - 147.

共引文献426

同被引文献409

引证文献26

二级引证文献293

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部