摘要
目的观察氧驱动雾化吸入与超声雾化吸入疗法治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎疗效。方法96例小儿喘憋性肺炎患儿随机分为两组。观察组为氧驱动雾化吸入组52例,对照组为超声雾化吸入组44例。结果氧驱动雾化吸入组显效率及总有效率、临床症状改善均优于超声雾化吸入组,两组间比较差异显著(P<0.01,P<0.05)。结论氧驱动雾化吸入法治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎有更好的疗效。
Objective To study the difference between Oxygenic force atomization atmotherapy and supersonic atomization atmotherapy in child bronchiolitis. Methods 96 bronchiolitis children were divided into study group and control group at random. There were 52 cases in study group in which oxygenic force atomization atmotherapy was used. There were 44 cases in control group in which supersonic atomization atmotherapy was used. Results The obvious effective rate, total effective rate and clinical symptom were improved in study group. There was an obvious difference between study group and control group（P 〈0.01, P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion The oxygenic force atomization atmotherapy is better than supersonic atomization atmotherapy in treating child bronchiolitis.
出处
《河南科技大学学报（医学版）》
2006年第4期254-255,共2页
Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology:Medical Science
关键词
雾化
超声
氧驱动
喘憋肺炎
小儿
atomization
supersonic
oxygenic force
bronchiolitis
child
