期刊文献+

36例髓母细胞瘤的临床治疗及回顾性分析 被引量:1

A prognostic analysis of the clinic treatment of 36 patients with cerebellar medulloblastomas
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的分析髓母细胞瘤临床治疗效果及预后影响因素。方法回顾性分析接受手术、放疗及化疗的髓母细胞瘤36例。按照Chang'sM分期,M0期23例,≥M1期13例。所有病例均接受了原发肿瘤的全切或次全切除手术。其中M0期6例全切术切除范围为肉眼肿瘤外延1.5cm者(根治术),接受全脑全脊髓放疗(craniospinalirradiation,CSI)24Gy,再局限于小脑加量24Gy。其余病例放疗先给予CSI30Gy,然后缩野至后颅窝局部加量20~25Gy,中位分次剂量为1.8Gy。所有≥M1期患者放疗后接受化疗。结果所有病例均完成了放疗及化疗,全组3、5年总生存率分别为69.4(%25/36)和61.1(%22/36)。其中6例根治手术加全脑全脊髓低剂量预防照射患者3、5年生存率均为83.3(%5/6);M0期全切或次全切手术加全脑全脊髓足量放射治疗患者3、5年生存率为70.6(%12/17)、58.8(%10/17);≥M1期患者61.5(%8/13)、53.8(%7/13)。17例全切或次全切手术加CSI足量放疗患者中,手术与放疗间隔时间≤21d、>21d的3年生存率分别为81.8(%9/11)、50.0(%3/6),无病生存率为72.2(%8/11)、33.3%(2/6)。辅助化疗对提高高危组的生存率有一定意义。放疗中最常见的副反应主要为白细胞下降,83.3(%30/36)的病例出现了白细胞计数下降(<4.0×109/dl),其中2、3级的血液系统毒性占55.6(%20/36);放疗后甲状腺功能改变发生率为44.4(%16/36)。结论髓母细胞瘤通过手术与放、化疗结合能取得较好疗效。手术与放疗间隔时间对生存率及复发率有一定影响,放疗中最常见的副反应为血液毒性和甲状腺功能改变,辅助化疗可以改善高危组的生存率。 [Objective] To analyze the treatment effects and prognostic factors of the thirty six patients with eerebellar medulloblastoma. [Methods] 36 patients with medulloblastoma, by Chang's staging system M0 and ≥M1 were admitted in our prognostic analysis. All patients received operation entirely or largely turnout resection. 6 of those received the radical cure operation by which turnout and 1.5cm tissue around it were reseeted. The patients who received the radical cure operation were irradiated with the technique: 24 Gy delivered to the whole craniospinal axis followed by a 24 Gy boost to the posterior fossa, with a median fraction dose of 1.8 Gy. All others patients were irradiated with the technique: 30 Gy delivered to the whole eraniospinal axis followed by a 20-25 Gy boost to the posterior fossa, with a median fraction dose of 1.8 Gy. All≥M1 patients also received chemotherapy. [Results] All patients had finished the radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. The overall 3 and 5 year survival rates were 69.4%(25/36) and 61.1% (22/36) respectively. The 3 and 5 year survival rates of the 6 patients, who received the radical cure operation and CSI 24 Gy followed by a 24 Gy boost to the posterior fossa, were 83.3%(5/6) and 83.3 %(5/6) respectively. The 3 and 5 year survival rates of all other M0 patients, who received entirely or largely tumour resection and complete dose radiotherapy, were 70.6%(12/17) and 58.8%(10/17) respectively. The 3 and 5 year survival rates of All ≥M1 patients were 61.5%(8/13) and 53.8%(7/13) respectively. Patients whose radiation treatment had been started within 21 days after operation showed a better survival than those beyond the 21th day, with 3 year overall survival of 81.8%(9/11), 50.0%(3/6), and 3 year disease free survivals of 72.2%(8/11), 33.3%(2/6) respectively. During the course of irradiation, the most common side effect was hematological toxicity, especially the WBC reduction which was observed in 83.3%(30/36) of patients, with 55.6%(20/36) of them suffering from grade 2-3 hematological toxicity. 44.4%(16/36) of the thyroid function lowered after radiotherapy. [Conclusions] Surgery plus craniospinal irradiation and chemotherapy is able to give a good result for medulloblastoma. The interval between surgery and radiation is a significant prognostic factor for disease free survival .The most common side effect is hematological toxicity and lower thyroid function.
出处 《中国医学工程》 2006年第6期653-656,共4页 China Medical Engineering
关键词 髓母细胞瘤 放射疗法 化学疗法 预后 medulloblastoma radiotherapy chemotherapy prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[1]HEIDEMAN RL,PACKER RJ,ALBRIGHT LA,et al.Tumors of the central nervous system.In:Pizzo DA,Poplack MO.Principles and practice of pediatric oncology,3rd edition[M].Philadelphia:Lippincott-Raven,1997,633-697.
  • 2[2]SARDINAS N,MARCOS R,PESTANA EM,et al.Tumors of the posterior fossa in children[J].Rev Neurol,1999,28:1153-1158.
  • 3[3]WHELAN HT,KROUWER HG,SCHMIDT MH,et al.Current therapy and new perspectives in the treatment of medulloblastoma[J].Pedatr Neurol,1998,18:103-115.
  • 4[4]FUKUNAGA-JOHNSON N,SANDLER HM,MARSH R,et al.The use of 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) to spare the cochlea in patients with medulloblastoma[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1998,41:77-82.
  • 5[5]MODHA A,VASSILYADI M,GEORGE A,et al.Medulloblastoma in children-the Ottawa experience[J].Childs Nerv Syst,2000,16:341-350.
  • 6[6]PACKER RJ,COGEN P,VEZINA G,et al.Medulloblastoma:clinical and biologic aspects[J].Neuro Oncol,1999,1:232-250.
  • 7[7]JENKIN D,SHABANAH MA,SHAIL EA,et al.Prognostic factors for medulloblastoma[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,47:573-584.
  • 8[8]KOCSIS B,SZ é kely G,PAP L,et al.Postoperative radiotherapy of childhood medulloblastomas[J].Neoplasma,2001,48:320-323.
  • 9[9]P KORTMANN RD,K ü hl J,TIMMERMANN B,et al.Postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy as compared to immediate radiotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in the treatment of medulloblastoma in childhood:results of the German prospective randomized trial HIT'91[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,46:269-279.
  • 10[10]PACKER RJ,GOLDWEIN J,NICHOLSON HS,et al.Treatment of children with medulloblastomas with reduced-dose craniospinal radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy:a children's cancer group study[J].J Clin Oncol,1999,17:2127-2136.

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部