我国上市公司高管团队成员的离职原因——基于人口特征差距的解释及经验研究被引量：17

导出

摘要一般观点认为,经营绩效低下是高管人员离职的主要原因,但大多数实证研究发现事实并非如此,这就给理论研究留下了余地。本文从人口特征差距视角对该问题进行了新的解释．通过对2000～2003年我国上市公司3111个高管团队中20781名高管人员的实证研究发现,当团队年龄差距、团队任期差距、教育水平差距三个人口特征差距变量值从25分位点上升到75分位点时,高管人员离职概率的增值分别是11.91%、13.75%、13.98%;而当企业绩效从25分位点上升到75分位点时,高管离职概率仅仅降低2.41%。结果显示了人口特征差距理论的相对有效性。因此,在实践中对人口特征多元化的高管团队尤其要重视和谐关系的建设,并积极关注和培育人口特征边缘化高管对团队的承诺。

作者柯江林孙健敏张必武

机构地区中国人民大学劳动人事学院上海浦东发展银行人力资源管理部

出处《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第23期55-60,共6页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )

关键词高管团队人口特征差距高管离职

分类号 F832.3 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1白让让.接管壁垒缺失与国有企业经营者低效更替的发生[J].中国工业经济,2002(3):70-76. 被引量：9
2Brickley J A, 2003, Empirical research on CEO turnover and firm-performance, a discussion,Journal of Accounting and Economics,35(3), 227-233.
3Schneider B, 1987, The people make the place,Personnel Psychology,40(3):437-453.
4Pfeffer J, 1983, Organizational demography,Research in Organizational Behavior,5(2), 299-357.
5Wagner W G, Pfeffer J, and O' Reilly C A,1984, Organizational demography and turnover in top management groups, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 74- 92.
6Wiersema M F, Bird A, 1993, Organizational demography in Japanese firms: group heterogeneity individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover, Academy of Management Journal,35(5),990-1025.
7魏立群,王智慧.我国上市公司高管特征与企业绩效的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2002,5(4):16-22. 被引量：244
8张必武,石金涛.国外高管团队人口特征与企业绩效关系研究新进展[J].外国经济与管理,2005,27(6):17-23. 被引量：43
9Thomas D and Ely R J, 1995, Making differences matter: A new paradigm for management diversity (diversity in the workplace), Harvard Business Review, 74, 79-91.
10Zenger T and Lawrence B, 1989, Organizational demography, the differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communications,Academy of Management Journal,32(2), 353- 375.

二级参考文献42

1[美]马克·J·洛：《强管理者，弱所有者》，上海远东出版杜1999年版。
2Charles, R. Knoeber., 1986, Golden Parachutes, Shark Repellents, and Hostile Tender Offers, The American Economic Review, 76:155-167.
3David, A. Smith and Patricia, C. O' brien., 1992, Takeover Defence and Shareholder Voting, Economiea, 59:199-219.
4Ellie, G. Harris.,1990, Anti-takeover Measures ,Golden Parachutes, and Target Firm Shareholder Welfare, The rand Journal of Economics, 21:614-625.
5Pamela, L, Hall and Dwight C. Anderson., 1997, The Effect of Golden Parachutes on Shareholder Wealth and Takeover Probabilities, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 24:445-463.
6[日]青木昌彦等魏加宁等译.《经济体制的比较制度分析》[M].[北京]中国发展出版社,1999年版.第175页.
7Hambrick D C, Mason P A. Upper echelons: organization as a reflection of its managers [J]. Academy Management Review, 1984, 9(2): 193-206.
8Pfeffer J. Organizational demography [J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1983, 5(2): 299-357.
9Wiersema M F, Bird A. Organizational demography in Japanese firms: group heterogeneity individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36(5) : 996-1025.
10Carpenter M A, Geletkanycz M A, Sanders W G. Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition [J]. Journal of Management, 2004, 30(6):749-778.