期刊文献+

大学生在人格问卷测谎量表上的得分与反应时的关系 被引量:6

A Study of Lie Scale and Its Correlation with Response Latency
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探索大学生在人格问卷测谎量表上的得分与反应时之间的关系,并且验证测谎量表得分与其他人格维度的关系。方法:采用“艾森克人格问卷”和“眀尼苏达多相人格测试”中的测谎量表,对132名高校学生进行测查。结果:大学生在测谎量表上的得分与反应时间存在正相关(P<0.05),测谎量表得分高的被试反应时间显著长于得分低的被试的反应时间(P<0.01)。此外,测谎量表的得分与神经质存在负相关(P<0.01),与精神质存在负相关(P<0.01)。结论:本研究发现了反应时与测谎量表得分的关系,为直接测量手段引入传统量表测验做了一定的铺垫。 Objective: To explore the relationship between college students' lie scale scores of personality questionnaire and response latency, and verify relationship between lie scale scores and other dimensionalities of personality. Methods: 132 college students were examined by the lie scales of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Results: There was significantly positive correlation between scores on lie scales and response latency (P〈0.05); college students who got high scores on lie scales had longer response latency than the low ones (P〈0.01); and it also presented a negative correlation in the relationship between the lie scale scores and both Neuroticism (P〈0.01 ) and Psychoticism (P〈0.01 ). Conclusion: This newly discovered correlation between lie scale scores and response latency could be taken as a good base for adopting the means of direct measurement into traditional scales.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 2006年第6期588-590,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 中国科学院重要方向项目(KSCX2-SW-221)的部分工作
关键词 测谎量表 反应时 神经质 精神质 Lie scale Response latency Neuroticism Psychoticism
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Greenwald AG,Banaji MR.Implicit social cognition:Attitudes,self-esteem,and stereotypes.Psychological Review,1995,102:4-27
  • 2Spence SA,Farrow TFD,Herford AE,Wilkinson ID,Woodruff PWR.Behavioral and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans.Neuroreport:For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research,2001,12:2849-2853
  • 3Barker L,Stern JA,Goldstein R.The gaze control system and the detection of deception.Fort Jackson,SC:Department of Defense Polygraph Institute,1990
  • 4Chris JJ,Leslie JF.Interpreting the correlation between neuroticism and lie scale scores.Personality and Individual Differences,1999,26:59-63
  • 5Martin FD,Christopher CF,Edmund K.Self-deceptive enhancement and impression management correlates of EPQR dimensions.The Journal of Psychology,1998,132 (4):401-406
  • 6Judd CM,McClelland GH.Data analysis:A modelcomparison approach.Orlando,FL:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1989
  • 7Mandler,G.Mind and emotion.New York:Wiley
  • 8Nisbett RE,Wilson TD.Telling more than we can know:Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review,1977,84:231-259
  • 9John NB.Meta-Judgmental Versus Operative Indexes of Psychological Attributes:The case of Mesures of Attitude Strength.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1996,71(4):637-653
  • 10Higgins ET.Beyond pleasure and pain.American Psychologist,1997,52:1280-1300

二级参考文献6

  • 1费立鹏 郑延平 邹定辉.家庭环境量表中文版(FES-CV)[A]..心理卫生评定量表手册[C].,1993.93-98.
  • 2Covington MV. Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: an integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200
  • 3Higgins ET. Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in experimental social psychology, 30, 1-46
  • 4Higgins ET, Friedman RS, Harlow RE, et al. Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1): 3-23
  • 5Higgins ET. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12): 1280-1300
  • 6Crowe E, Higgins ET. Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1997, 69:117-132

共引文献15

同被引文献70

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部