期刊文献+

锁骨下静脉途径心脏起搏器置入术中撕剥式电极导线导引器的应用 被引量:4

Using value of peel away catheter introducer in cardiac pacemaker implantation through the subclavian vein puncture.
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨撕剥式电极导线导引器在经锁骨下静脉途径行永久性心脏起搏器置入术中的应用价值。方法103例经锁骨下静脉途径行永久性心脏起搏器置入术患者根据电极导线置入时是否保留撕剥式电极导线导引器分为非保留组(n=50),保留组(n=53),每组又根据置入起搏器类型分为单腔起搏器组和双腔起搏器组两个亚组。比较两组手术时间、X线曝光时间、电极导线放置失败率、手术并发症并随访切口及囊袋情况、起搏器工作状态等。结果保留组手术时间、X线曝光时间及电极导线放置失败率明显少于非保留组(68.8±18.3min vs 77.5±18.9min;4.36±1.34min vs 5.57±1.62min;0% vs 7.9%,P均〈0.05-0.01),亚组分析显示不论单腔、双腔起搏器置入,保留组手术时间、x线曝光时间均明显短于非保留组(P均〈0.01)。保留组与非保留组各有1例术后出现需处理的囊袋血肿,2组术后随访5个月-4.3年,未见其他并发症,起搏器工作状态良好。结论经锁骨下静脉穿刺途径置入永久性心脏起搏器时,保留撕剥式电极导线导引器能缩短手术时间、X线曝光时间,减少电极导线置放失败率,值得在临床进一步推广应用。 Objective To investigate the using value of peel away catheter introducer in cardiac pacemaker implantation through the subclavian vein puncture. Methods 103 cases who were implanted pacemaker through the right subclavian vein puncture were individed into two groups according to whether or not retained peel away catheter introducer when catheter inputted as non-retained group( n = 50) and retained group( n = 53 ), and also into two subgroups as the single chamber and dual chamber according to implanted pacemaker types. Their procedure time, fluoroscopy time , catheter inputted failure rate and complications were compared. The scores of incision, pocket and working situation of pacemaker were obtained. Results The procedure time, fluoroscopy time and catheter inputted failure rate in retained group were significantly less than those in non-retained group(68.8 ± 18.3 min vs 77.5 ±18.9 min;4.36 ± 1.34 min vs 5.57 ± 1.62 min:0% vs 7. 9%, all P 〈 0.05 - 0.01 ), and subgroup analysed the procedure time and fluoroscopy time in single chamber subgroup and dual chamber subgroup in retained group were significantly less than those in non-retained group( all P 〈 0.01 ). One pocket haematoma treated case was found in every group. Both groups were following up 5 months to 4.3 years, and no other complication was found. The working situation of pacemaker was good. Conclusion It is helpful to reduce procedure time, fluoroscopy time and catheter inputted failure rate, when cardiac pacemaker implantation through the subclavian vein puncture retained peel away catheter introducer. Popularizing this method is feasibility.
出处 《中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志》 2006年第6期506-508,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology
关键词 心血管病学 锁骨下静脉穿刺 心脏起搏器 撕剥式电极导线导引器 Cardiology Subclavian vein puncture Cardiac pacemaker Peel away catheter introducer
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1张奎俊.永久性心脏起搏器置入术.见:马长生,盖鲁粤,张奎俊,等主编.介入心脏病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.973-982
  • 2王方正.永久性心脏起搏器置入技术.见:陈新主编.临床心律失常学-电生理和治疗[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.1597-1616
  • 3Tse HF,Lau CP,Leung SK.A cephalic vein cutdow and venography technique to facilitate pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation[J].PACE,2001,24(Pt.I):469
  • 4李京波,魏盟,陆志刚,杭靖宇,马士新,黄蓓丽,孙继红.锁骨下静脉穿刺与头静脉切开途径安置心脏起搏器的随机对照研究[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2003,17(4):273-275. 被引量:11
  • 5Calkins H,Ramza BM,Brinker J,et al.Prospective randomized comparison of the safety and effectiveness of placement of endocardial pacemaker and defibrillator leads using the extrathoracic subclavian vein guided by contrast venography versus the cephalic approach[J].PACE,2001,24(Pt.Ⅰ):456

二级参考文献6

  • 1Tse HF, Lau CP, Leung SK. A cephalic vein cutdown and venography technique to facilitate pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation[J]. PACE, 2001,24( Pt. Ⅰ) :469.
  • 2Calkins H, Ramza BM, Brinker J, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of the safety and effectiveness of placement of endocardial pacemaker and defibrillator leads using the extrathoracic subclavian vein guided by contrast venography versus the cephalic approach [J].PACE, 2001, 24(Pt.Ⅰ):456.
  • 3Bernstein AD, Parsonnet V. Survey of cardiac pacemakers in the United States in 1989[J]. Am J Cardiol,1992, 69:331.
  • 4Aggarwal RK, Connelly DT, Ray SG. Early complications of permanent pacemaker implantation: No difference between dual and single chamber systems[J]. Br Heart J, 1995, 73:571.
  • 5Chauhan A, Grace AA, Newell SA. Early complications after dual chamber versus single chamber pacemaker implantation [ J ]. PACE,1994, 17(Pt. Ⅱ) :2012.
  • 6Parsonnet V, Bernstein A, Lindsay B. Pacemaker-implantation complication rates: An analysis of some contributing factors[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1989, 13:917.

共引文献10

同被引文献18

  • 1Tse HF,Lau CP,Leung SK.A cephalic vein cutdow and venography technique to facilitate pacemaker and defibrillator lead Imp-lantation.PACE,2001,24:469.
  • 2Calkins H,Ramza BM,Brinker J,et al.Prospective randomized comparison of the,safety and effectiveness of placement of endocardial pacemaker and defibrillator leads using the extrathoracic subclavian vein guided by contrast venography versus the cephalic approach.PACE,2001,2A:456.
  • 3Lickfett L, Bitzen A, Arepally A, et al. Incidence of venous obstruction following insertion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. A study of systematic contrast venography on patients presenting for their first elective ICD generator replacement. Europace,2004,6( 1 ) :25-31.
  • 4郭继鸿,王斌.实用心脏起搏学.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2006:105.
  • 5张奎俊.永久性心脏起搏器置入术.见:马长生,盖鲁粤,张奎俊,等主编.介入心脏病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.973-982
  • 6王方正.永久性心脏起搏器置入技术.见:陈新主编.临床心律失常学-电生理和治疗[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.1597-1616
  • 7Bernstein AD, Parsonnet V. Survey of cardiac pacemakersin the United Statesin 1989[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1992,69:331.
  • 8Aggarwal RK, Connelly DT, Ray SG. Early complications of permanent pacemaker implantation: Nodifference between dual and single chamber systems[J]. Br Heart J, 1995,73:571.
  • 9Chanhan A, GraceA A, NeweU SA. Early complications after dual chamber versus single chamber pacemaker implantation[J]. PACE, 1994, 17 (Pt) :2012.
  • 10Parsonnet V, Bernstein A, Lindsay B. Pacemaker implantation complication rates: An analysis of some contributing factors[J]. Jam Coll Cardiol,1989, 13:917.

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部