期刊文献+

曲马多联合小剂量吗啡、芬太尼用于术后硬膜外患者自控镇痛效果的临床研究

Clinical study of analgesic effect of tramadol combined with low-dose morphine or fentanyl on postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的采用术后硬膜外患者自控镇痛(PCEA)对曲马多联合小剂量吗啡或芬太尼的镇痛效果进行研究。方法将120例接受PCEA的腹部手术患者(美国麻醉医师协会分级Ⅰ-Ⅱ级)随机分为3组。T组镇痛液为0.6%曲马多,TM组为0.4%曲马多和0.004%吗啡,TF组为0.4%曲马多和0.000 4%芬太尼。采用相同PCEA参数:持续输注量2 mL/h,单次自控给药量1 mL,锁定时间为20 min。结果TM组和TF组在镇痛早期(第4、8和24小时)视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分明显低于T组(P值均<0.01);在镇痛终点(第48小时)3组间差异无显著性(P>0.05)。T组的PCEA按压次数和总用量明显高于TM组和TF组(P<0.01或<0.05)。TF组的不良反应如恶心、呕吐等的发生率明显少于T组和TM组(P值均<0.05)。TF组的患者总体满意度明显高于T组和TM组(P值均<0.05)。结论与单用曲马多相比,联合小剂量吗啡或芬太尼可取得更佳的镇痛效果,特别在镇痛早期。由于镇痛效果可靠和不良反应少,曲马多联合小剂量芬太尼是一种值得推荐的PCEA方法。 Objective To study the analgesic effect for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) of tramadol combined with low-dose morphine or fentanyl. Methods One hundred twenty patients (ASA status Ⅰ - Ⅱ ) undergoing abdominal operation with PCEA were randomly allocated to three groups, forty for each. The analgesic solutions were 0.6% tramadol in Group T, 0.4% tramadol and 0. 004% morphine in Group TM, 0.4 % tramadol and 0. 000 4 % fentanyl in Group TF. The same LCP parameters were used in continuous infusion of 2 mL/h and a bolus dose of 1 mL with a lockout interval of 20 rain. Results In the early analgesic time (4, 8 and 24 h), the VAS scores of Group TM and Group TF were lower than that of Group T with no significant differences in the analgesic end point (48 h). The number of PCEA demanded and total dose of Group T were higher than those of Group TM and Group TF. Lower incidence of side effects such as nausea and vomiting occurred in Group TF. Comparing to Group T and Group TM, Group TF patients received the highest Global Satisfaction Score (GSS). Conclusion Tramadol combined with low-dose morphine or fentanyl produces good quality of pain relief than tramadol alone, especially in the early analgesic stage. Tramadol combined with low-dose fentanyl was considered as a satisfactory method for PCEA with reliable analgesia and low incidence of side effects. (Shanghai MedJ, 2006, 29..718-720)
出处 《上海医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第10期718-720,共3页 Shanghai Medical Journal
关键词 硬膜外患者自控镇痛 术后 曲马多 吗啡 芬太尼 Patient controlled epidural analgesia Postoperative Tramadol Morphine Fentanyl
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Paice JA,Winkelmuller W,Burchiel K,et al.Clinical realities and economic considerations:efficacy of intrathecal pain therapy.J Pain Symptom Manage,1997,14(3 suppl):S14-S26.
  • 2Stamer UM,Maier C,Grond S,et al.Tramadol in the management of post-operative pain:a double-blind,placebo-and active drug-controlled study.Eur J Anaesthesiol,1997,14:646-654.
  • 3Houmes RJ,Voets MA,Verkaaik A,et al.Efficacy and safety of tramadol versus morphine for moderate and severe postoperative pain with special regard to respiratory depression.Anesth Analg,1992,74:510-514.
  • 4Kehlet H,Werner M,Perkins F.Balanced analgesia:what is it and what are its advantages in postoperative pain? Drugs,1999,58:793-797.
  • 5Blackburn A,Stevens JD,Wheatley RG,et al.Balanced analgesia with intravenous ketorolac and patient-controlled morphine following lower abdominal surgery.J Clin Anesth,1995,7:103-108.
  • 6Kehlet H.Effect of postoperative pain treatment on outcomecurrent status and future strategies.Langenbecks Arch Surg,2004,389:244-249.
  • 7Eriksson H,Tenhunen A,Korttila K.Balanced analgesia improves recovery and outcome after outpatient tubal ligation.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,1996,40:151-155.
  • 8Glass PS,Estok P,Ginsberg B,et al.Use of patient-controlled analgesia to compare the efficacy of epidural to intravenous fentanyl administration.Anesth Analg,1992,74:345-351.
  • 9Sandler AN,Stringer D,Panos L,et al.A randomized,double-blind comparison of lumbar epidural and intravenous fentanyl infusions for postthoracotomy pain relief.Analgesic,pharmacokinetic,and respiratory effects.Anesthesiology,1992,77:626-634.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部