摘要
采用“高校配对比较任务”和“城市配对比较任务”检验Goldstein等2002年提出的推理的再认启发模型,结果证明:人们在相关信息不足、知识和时间都有限的情况下,采用再认启发策略进行推理的比率相当高,并且出现了“少即是多”效应。本研究还探讨了Goldstein等没有考虑的因素,结果发现:在压力作用下,人们仍然会采用再认启发策略进行推理;再认启发中被试会运用无关信息进行推理;在操作时间上也会出现“少即是多”效应。
The study adopted ＂the critical-pairs-in-the-universities task＂ and ＂the critical-pairs-in-the-cities task＂ to examine the recognition heuristic model promoted by D.G. Goldstein and G. Gigerenzer in 2002. The result showed that ： People largely used the recognition heuristic inference strategy when knowledge was missing, time limited and information insufficient and it brought about the ＂less-is-more effect＂. The research studied the factors that Goldstein hadn＇t considered. We found that under the conditions of pressures people still used the recognition heuristic inference strategy. In addition to the recognition heuristic, people might use independent information to infer. We also found the ＂less-is-more effect＂ in operational time.
出处
《心理科学》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第6期1354-1358,共5页
Journal of Psychological Science
基金
西南师范大学国家级重点学科经费的资助
重点实验室建设经费的资助(西国重04001
06001)
关键词
再认启发
启发式策略
“少即是多”效应
the recognition heuristic, noneompensatory way, the ＂less-is-more＂ effect
