期刊文献+

我国地区间用于科技发展的研发绩效评估与比较 被引量:20

Calculation and Comparison of R&D Performance for Technical Development Among Areas in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文运用DEA方法对我国三类地区2000—2003年研发效率的评估和比较发现,研发投入的数量与研发产出的数量、质量呈现正相关性,但产出数量与质量并不完全取决于投入,研发投入力度最大的第一类型区总技术效率和纯技术效率最高,而研发投入力度最小的第三类型区总技术效率和纯技术效率却高于第二类型区;三类地区技术无效率主要来自纯技术无效率,从变动趋势进一步分析发现,第二类型区的纯技术效率呈现不断改善的趋势,第一、三类型区的纯技术效率却在持续恶化。上述发现说明三类地区在研发活动的管理体制和决策机制上皆存在缺陷,从而致使投入要素使用出现严重的非效率现象。因此,在我国目前科技资源投入有限的情况下,提高科研效率应成为提升科技竞争力的关键环节。 Utilizing the DEA method to calculate and compare R&D performance among areas in China during 2000-2003, we find that there are positive relationship between input quantities in R&D and output quantities and quality in R&D.But the output quantities and quality are decided incompletely by input quantities.Total technical effi- ciency and pure technical efficiency are the highest in the first type area where R&D input intensity is the largest,but the total technical efficiency and pure technical efficiency in the third type area are higher than the second type area.Technical inefficiency in three kinds of areas comes mainly from pure technical inefficiency. Based on further analysis of the change tendency,we can find that the pure technical efficiency in the second type area has been improving.The pure technical efficiency in the first and third type areas has been worsen- ing.The above discoveries show that three kinds of areas all have flaws in the management system and policy- making mechanism of R&D activity,which causes serious inefficiency in using input factors.Therefore,with limited science and technology resources,enhancing technical efficiency should become an essential link to promote the science and technology competitiveness.
出处 《财贸经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第11期46-51,共6页 Finance & Trade Economics
关键词 研发绩效 效率评估 差额变量 MALMQUIST生产力指数 R&D Performance Efficiency Calculation Differential Variable Malmquist productivity index
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献16

  • 1姚树洁,冯根福,姜春霞.中国银行业效率的实证分析[J].经济研究,2004,39(8):4-15. 被引量:248
  • 2池仁勇,唐根年.基于投入与绩效评价的区域技术创新效率研究[J].科研管理,2004,25(4):23-27. 被引量:187
  • 3朱乔,盛昭瀚.数据包络模型与规模收益分析[J].系统工程学报,1993,8(2):54-60. 被引量:26
  • 4王清印,灰色数学基础,1996年
  • 5施建军,技统计分析与评价,1990年
  • 6Schmookler J. Griliches I Z, Hursicz L(eds). Patents,Invention, and Economic Change: Data and Selected Essays Cambrige [ M ]. MA: Harvard University Press,1972.45 - 78.
  • 7Acs, Z J, Audretsch D B. Innovation, market structure,and firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics [ J ].1987, 69(4) :567 -74.
  • 8Lovell C A K. Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency [ M ]. New York : Oxford University Press, 1993.56-59.
  • 9Leibenstein H, Maital S. The organizational foundations of X- inefficiency: A game- theoretic Interpretation of Argyris' model of organizational learning [ J ]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1994,23 (3): 251- 268.
  • 10Scherer F M. Demand - pull and technological invention:Schmookler revisited [ J ]. Journal of Industrial Economics,1982, 30(3) :225 -237.

共引文献109

同被引文献264

引证文献20

二级引证文献387

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部