期刊文献+

中国卫生改革的公正性和社会责任 被引量:4

The Fairness and Social Responsibility of the Health Care Reform in China
暂未订购
导出
摘要 世界卫生组织的宪章和有关卫生大会的决议多次指出“人人享有最高而可获得的健康标准是一项人类的基本权利”。中国曾经是发展中国家贯彻世界卫生组织人人享有卫生保健战略目标的楷模。随着社会经济的发展,人口结构及疾病谱的改变,科技的迅速进步,我们需要进行卫生改革,但世界上没有现成的模式。分析了我国的卫生改革中取得的伟大成就,但在医疗卫生改革中缺乏伦理考量卫生资源分配的不公正和政府在卫生总投入中所占的比例不足,是造成“看病难、看病贵”的主要原因。由世界卫生组织和联合国教科文组织最近所提出的伦理准则分析了卫生改革的公正性和社会责任。 The constitution and the resolutions of the World Health Organization had indicated times and again, that "The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of the human being". China.was a good example of the developing countries, in its implementation of the WHO health for all strategy. To meet the challenge of social economic change, the demographic and disease pattern change and the rapid development of science and technology, there is a need for reform the health care system; however there is no perfect model to follow. To analyse the experiences of our health care reform, we had made great achievement, but there was a lack of consideration on health ethics, the unfairness of the health resources distribution and the lack of government import are the key effects for cause of "too difficulty and too expensive to see a doctor". To also analyse the fairness and social responsibilities, based on the ethics guiding principles of the World Health Organization and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
作者 胡庆澧
出处 《医学与哲学(A)》 北大核心 2006年第11期1-5,共5页 Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
关键词 初级卫生保健 卫生改革 卫生资源 公正性 社会责任 primary health care, health care reform, health resources, fairness, social responsibilities
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1国务院发展研究中心课题组,对中国医疗体制改革的评价与建议(要点)[EB/OL](2005—07—29)[2006—07—20].http://www.sina. com. cn/
  • 2World Health Organization. World Health Report 2000: Health Systems: Improving Performance[M]. Geneva: WHO, 2000:188 - 191.
  • 3WHO/Europe : The Ljubljana Charter on Reforming Health Care ,Copenhagen : World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe,1996, http://www, euro. who. int/Abort WHO/Policy/20010927 5
  • 4BMJ Editorials: European health Policy: must redefine its raison d'etre[J ]. British Medical Journal, 1996, (312) : 1 622 - 1 623.
  • 5World Health Organization. Basic Documents Forty - first Edition,Constitution of the World Health Organization [M]. Geneva: WHO,1996.
  • 6UNGSCO: Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Right[M],Paris: UNESCO, 2005.
  • 7WHO UNAIDS: Guidance on Ethics and Equitable Access to HIV Treatment and Care[M]. Geneva: WHO, 2004.
  • 8卫生部长作关于医疗卫生事业改革与发展报告(全文),中国新闻网[EB/OL].(2005—09—03)[2005—09—03]http://finance.sina.cn/chanjing/b/20050803/20511860621, shtml
  • 9邱仁宗.10年“医疗改革不成功”问题出在哪里?[EB/OL].(2005-08 - 29 ) [ 2006 - 07 - 20 ]. http://info, pham. hc360, com/2005/08/29180975685 - 2. shtml
  • 10杜治政.医学伦理学的重要课题:卫生经济伦理学——评《后现代卫生经济伦理学》[J].医学与哲学,2000,21(5):20-22. 被引量:4

二级参考文献11

共引文献3

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部