摘要
Recent embryological evidence of studies of seedlings of Cupressus L.along with chemotaxonomic studies of heartwood components has demonstrated that Cupressus lusitanica Mill.did indeed originate from the country of India.In the mid-sixteenth century,Portuguese merchants established early trade routes between India and Portugal.The trade developed from the spice industry confirms Miller’s (1768) original description that Cupressus lusitanica did indeed originate from India.Later authors suggested that Cupressus lusitanica cultivated in Portugal was introduced from wild populations of Cupressus in Mexico.However,this latter theory was never accepted by native botanist in the country of Mexico,including noted botanist M.martinez (1948).In fact,all Cupressus species in India seem to have a different embryology than that of all Cupressus species in Nepal, Bhutan, China and Vietnam (Silba,1994).
Recent embryological evidence of studies of seedlings of Cupressus L. along with chemotaxonomic studies of heartwood components has demonstrated that Cupressus lusitanica Mill. did indeed originate from the country of India. In the midsixteenth century, Portuguese merchants established early trade mutes between India and Portugal. The trade deveh）ped from the spice industry confirms Miller＇ s （1768） original description that Cupressus lusitatdca did indeed originate from India. Later authors suggested that Cupressus lusitanica cultivated in Portugal was introduced from wild populations of Cupresus in Mexico. However, this latter theory was never accepted by native botanist in the country of Mexico, including noted bo ＇tanist M. martinez （ 1948）. In fact, all Cupressus species in India seem to have a different embryology than that of all Cupressus species in Nepal, Bhutan, China and Vietnam （Silba, 1994）.
出处
《云南植物研究》
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第5期469-470,共2页
Acta Botanica Yunnanica
