期刊文献+

舰载武器系统研制方案多目标生成与评价方法 被引量:1

Multi-objective generation and evaluation method of development alternatives for warship-born weapon system
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 舰载武器系统研制方案的生成、评价与优选问题是武器装备研制论证中的重要内容.在分析目前舰载武器系统研制方案论证方法的基础上,构建了舰载武器系统多目标优化模型,提出了舰载武器系统研制方案的多目标生成方法,并建立了不完全偏好信息的舰载武器系统研制方案的多目标评价与优选模型.实例分析说明,该模型与方法是有效的,可为武器装备研制论证问题提供辅助决策方法和智力支持. The problem of generation, evaluation and optimal choice of development alternatives for warship-born weapon system (WWS) is an important part in the weapon equipment development and argumentation. Based on the analysis of merits of argumentation methods, the multi-objective optimization model of WWS is constructed and multi-objective generation method of its development alternatives is proposed, and the corresponding model of multi-objective evaluation and optimal choice is established. The model and method proposed are illustrated with a real example and may provide auxiliary decision-making methods and intelligence support for the weapon equipment development and argumentation.
作者 李登峰 靳娜
出处 《海军工程大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2006年第5期1-4,共4页 Journal of Naval University of Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70571086) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2005-18) 国家教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金项目(2005-546)
关键词 武器装备研制论证 武器系统作战效能 多目标决策 方案生成 综合评价与优选 weapon equipment development and argumentation combat efficiency of weapon system multi-objective decision-making alternative generation comprehensive evaluation and optimal choice
分类号 E911 [军事]
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Michael W, Brad R. Reduction of Total Ownership Cost [R]. Graduate School of Business and Public Policy, Naval Graduate School, U. S. , 2003.
  • 2李登峰,陈守煜.多目标优化问题的模糊交叉算法与收敛性[J].应用数学,1997,10(3):107-109. 被引量:23
  • 3Li D F. Multiattribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets [J]. Journal of Computer and System Science, 2005,70:73--85.
  • 4Li D F. An approach to fuzzy multiattribute decision making under uncertainty [J].Information Sciences, 2005,169(12):97-112.
  • 5Ronald L. Quantitative Decision Support for Upgrading Complex Systems of Systems [R]. Washington: The School of Engineering and Applied Science of the George Washington University, 1997.

共引文献22

同被引文献6

  • 1邱根胜.多指标决策广义双基点法[J].运筹与管理,2004,13(6):66-68. 被引量:3
  • 2杨海云,李珍照,常晓林.水电工程项目评标中的熵权决策法及其应用[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2005,38(2):44-48. 被引量:19
  • 3WANG Ying-ming, PARKAN C. Multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives: Ranking and weighting[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2005(153):331-346.
  • 4OLCER A I, ODABASI A Y. A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005 ( 166 ) : 93-114.
  • 5MILANI A S, SHANIAN A. The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: A case study in gear material selection [J]. Struct. Multidisc Optim. , 2005(29) :312-318.
  • 6VAIDYA O S, KUMAR S. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006(169) : 1-29.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部