摘要
目的比较输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术(PL)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESW L)治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效。方法对经PL(PL组)和ESW L(ESW L组)治疗的输尿管下段结石患者的临床资料进行比较。结果PL组单次碎石成功率为95.2%。EW SL组为62.5%(P<0.05),PL组术后4周结石排净率为98.4%,EW SL组为67.6%。两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效明显优于EW SL。
Objective To contrast the therapeutic effect and safety of ureteroscopy pneumatic Lithotripsy （PL） and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy （ESWL） in the treatment of distal ureteral calculi. Methods To investigated the clinical material of the treatment of distal ureteral calculi, 125 patients with PL, 136 patients with ESWL. Results In PL group 95.2% patients were successful on the first lithotripsy, 62.5% in ESWL group （P〈 0.05）; following PL 98.4% patients became stone free in 4 weeks, after ESWL the stone free rate was 67.6% （P〈0.05）. Conclusions For the treatment of distal ureteral calculi, ureteroscopy pneumatic lithotripsy has a higher stone free rate than ESWL.
出处
《海南医学》
CAS
2006年第11期2-3,共2页
Hainan Medical Journal
关键词
输尿管结石
输尿管镜
碎石术
Ureteral calculi
Ureteroscopy
Lithotripsy
