摘要
本文讨论《礼记》经注诸版本间之关系及其价值,认为现存版本可分两系统,一为《唐石经》———宋监本系统,抚州本、八行注疏本属焉;余仁仲本、纂图互注本及十行注疏本、闽、监、毛本属另一系统。清代校勘《礼记》的两部代表性著作《礼记注疏校勘记》、《抚本礼记考异》都未见到余仁仲本及纂图互注本,因而未能辨识十行本众多讹误的由来。今校余仁仲本,知十行本经注文本的底本是余仁仲本或类似余仁仲本的别本,十行本与抚本、八行本之间没有直接的继承关系。至于岳本,应视为这两种系统的混成品,实不足珍重。这种认识也推翻了十行本在经注、疏汇刻本的基础上附入《释文》而成的通俗概念。
This article discusses the relations and the value of the various editions of ＂The Book of Rites＂. The author thinks the extant stone＂ （ Tang- Shijing） and Edition and The Eight-Co can be divided into two systems, one is ＂the Tang Confucian classics carved on the Song-Imperial-Academy Edition（Song-jianben） system which includes The Fuzhou lumn Edition with explanatory notes and commentaries（Bahang-zhushu-ben）. The other system includes the Yu Renzhong＇ s Edition, the Chart-compiling and inter-explanatory Edition （Zuantu-huzhu- ben）, the Ten-Column Edition with explanatory notes and commentaries （Shihang-zhushu-ben）, the Min Edition （Minben）, the Imperial-Academy Edition and Mao＇s Edition （Mao Ben）. Both of the two representative works of ＂The Book of Rites＂ of Qing Dynasty-＂The collating notes of the explanatory notes and commentaries of ＇The Book of Rites＇ ＂（Liji-zhushu-jiaokanji） and ＂The checking notes of ＇The Book of Rites＇ in The Fuzhou-Edition＂ （Fuben-liji-kaoyi）-had not seen Yu Renzhong＇s Edition, the Chart-compiling and Inter-explanatory Edition, thus had not been able to recognize the reasons of multitudinous errors of the Ten-Column Edition with explanatory notes and commentaries. While collating Yu Renzhong＇ s Edition, we can see that the text libretto of the original and explanatory text of Ten-Column Edition is the Yu Ren-zhong＇s Edition or its similar alias.
出处
《北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第5期103-110,共8页
Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
"全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目(200316)"成果之一
关键词
礼记
版本
校勘记
Liji
textual criticism
versions
