摘要
目的:探讨口服胺碘酮和心律平(普罗帕酮)治疗心房纤颤的效果。方法:采用随机对照试验比较两者在转复房颤,维持窦性节律及不良反应上的情况。结果:两者在心房纤颤的转复率上无明显差异,而胺碘酮在维持窦性节律及安全性方面优于心律平。结论:胺碘酮在治疗心房纤颤,维持窦性节律比心律平有明显的优越性且安全,值得在临床是推广。
Objective： It is to observe the effect of amiodarone and propafenone on atrial fibrillation. Methods： The condition of the two medicines on converting atrial fibrillation and maintaing the sinus rhythm as well as the side effects were compared by random and contrast test. Results. There was no obvious difference in converting atrial fibrillation, but amiodarone was much better than popafenone in rnaitaining the sinus rhythm and safer in treament of artrial fibrillation. Conclusion. Oral amiodarone is much better than propafenone in treating atrial fibrillation.
出处
《四川生理科学杂志》
2006年第3期134-135,共2页
Sichuan Journal of Physiological Sciences
关键词
胺碘酮
心律平
心房纤颤
Amiodarone
Propafenone
Atrial fibrillation
