期刊文献+

不同生态条件下华抗草78水稻对杂草的干扰控制作用 被引量:11

Interference of allelopathic rice Huakangcao 78 on weeds under different ecological conditions.
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 对不同水稻叶龄、水层深度、水稻密度和保水时间条件下水稻对杂草控制效果进行研究.结果表明,具有化感特性的水稻品系华抗草78对稗草、鳢肠、异型莎草等杂草的抑制率显著优于无化感特性品种Lemont;华抗草78对0~1.5叶期稗草和0~0.3叶期异型莎草的控制效果优于1.5~2.4叶期稗草和0.8~2.0叶期异型莎草;移栽时叶龄与栽插密度互作有利于提高华抗草78对杂草的防效,并明显高于移栽时叶龄分别与水层深度和保水时间互作效应.适当提高水稻移栽时的叶龄、增加移栽密度可显著提高华抗草78对供试杂草的抑制率. A pot culture experiment was conducted to examine the interference effectiveness of allelopathic rice Huakangcao 78 on weeds Eehinoehloa erusgalli L. , Cyperus difformis L. , and Eelipta prostrata L. as affected by flee leaf age during transplanting, plant density, and soil surface water depth and its retaining days. The results showed that Huakangcao'78 could significantly reduce the dry weight of weeds compared with non-allelopathie flee Lemont. The control effectiveness of Huakangeao 78 on E. erusgalli L. was better when the weed was at 0 - 1.5 leaf age than at 1.5 - 2.4 leaf age, and that on C. difformis L. was better when the weed was at 0 - 0. 3 leaf age than at 0. 8 - 2.0 leaf age. The interactive effectiveness between rice leaf age during transplanting and plant density on weed control was better than that between the leaf age and soil surface water depth and its retaining days. To increase the rice leaf age during transplanting and plant density could significantly promote the control effectiveness of Huakangeao 78 on weeds.
出处 《应用生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第9期1645-1648,共4页 Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(30430460) 国家"十五"科技攻关资助项目(2004BA509B07).
关键词 水稻 生态条件 化感效应 杂草 干扰控制 Rice (Oryza sativ L. ), Ecological condition, Allelopathic effectiveness, Weeds, Interference.
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献34

  • 1[5]Dilday R H. Identification of allelopathy in USDA-ARS rice germplasm collection. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1994,34(2):907-910.
  • 2[6]Olofsdotter M D. Ricea step toward use of allelopathy.Agronomy Journal, 2001,93(1):3-8.
  • 3[8]Tang C,Young C. Collection and identification of allelopathic compounds from the undisturbed root system of bigalta limpograss (Hemarthria altissirua). Plant Physiology, 1982,69(1):155 160.
  • 4[9]Romeo J T, Weidenhamer J D. Bioassays for allelopathy in terrestrial plants. In: Methods in Chemical Ecology.Vol 2 Bioassay Methods. Haynes K F and Miller J G eds.Norvell MA:Kluwer Academic Publishing, 1999:179-120.
  • 5[10]Willamson G B, Richardson D. Biossays for allelopathy:measuring treatment response with independent controls.Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1998, 14(1):181-188.
  • 6[12]Blum U, Shafer S R, Lehman M E. Evidence for inhibitory allelopathic interactions involving phenolic acid in field soils: concept vs. an experimental model. Critical Review of Plant Science 1999,18(2): 673-693.
  • 7[13]Kong C H, Hu F, Xu X H. Allelopathic potential of volatiles from Ageratum conyzoides under stress. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2002, 28(6):1 173-1 182.
  • 8[14]Wu H, Haig T, Pratley J. Distribution and exudation of allelochemicals in wheat. Journal of Chemical Ecology,2000,26(10):2 141-2 154.
  • 9[15]Rimando A M, Olofsdotter M, Dayan F E. Searching for rice allochemicals: An example of bioassay-guided isolation.Agronomy Journal, 2001, 93(1):16-20.
  • 10[16]Olofsdotter M, Rebulanan M, Madrid A. Why phenolic acids are unlikely primary allelochemicals in rice. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2002,28(2):229-241.

共引文献230

同被引文献182

引证文献11

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部