期刊文献+

转基因技术的伦理争论:困境与出路 被引量:23

Ethical Debates over Transgenic Technology: Predicament and Solution
原文传递
导出
摘要 转基因技术是一项充满风险的技术,人们对它的大规模应用产生了极大的不安和焦虑,并在科学上和伦理上引起了全球范围的争议。人们对转基因技术的伦理争论主要涉及仁慈、不伤害、自主、正义、尊重自然等伦理原则。由于对这些伦理原则的诉求导致了相互矛盾的实践意涵,因而使人们的争论陷入了困境。走出这种困境的方法,一是对人们所援引的伦理原则进行价值排序,一是把预防原则作为制定相关政策的决策伦理。 Transgenic technology is a kind of risky technology. Its intensive applications, on one hand, result in huge unease and anxieties; on the other hand, bring about political and ethical debates globally. The ethical debates mainly involve such principles, benevolence, no harm, autonomy, justice and respect for nature. Appeal to those principles leads to contradictory practical implications and thus puts people in predicament. The solution to this predicament is to prioritize these ethical principles, and take precautionary principle as the ethical guideline for policy-making correspondingly.
作者 杨通进
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第5期53-59,共7页 Journal of Renmin University of China
关键词 风险社会 转基因技术 预防原则 risk society transgenic technology precautionary principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1S. Sexton, N. Hildyard and L. Lohmann.Food? Health? Hope? Genetic Engineering and World Hunger [DB/OL]. http://www. thecornerhouse. org.uk/item. shtml? x=51965.
  • 2Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Genetically Modified Crops: The Social and Ethical Issues[DB/OL].http://www. nuffieldbioethics. org/go/screen/ourwork/gmcrops/publication_301. html.
  • 3G. Bharathan, S. Chandrashekaran, T. May,and J. Bryant. Crop Biotechnology and Developing Countries[A], in J. Bryant, L. La Velle and J. Searle(eds. ) :Bioethics for Scientists [C]. Hoboken, NJ. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2002.
  • 4World Scientists. Open Letter From World Scientists to All Governments Concerning Genetically Modified Organisms [DB/OL]. http://www. i-sis. org.uk/list. php.
  • 5毛新志,殷正坤.转基因食品的标签与知情选择的伦理分析[J].科学学研究,2004,22(1):23-27. 被引量:16
  • 6J. Hughes. Genetically Modified Crops and the Precautionary Principle: Is There a Case for a Moratoriurn? [A]. in B. Almond and M. Parker (eds.). Ethical Issues in New Genetics: Are Genes Us[C]. Aldershot,Hampshire: Ashgate, 2003.
  • 7D. Freestone and E. Hey(eds. ). The Precautionary Principle and International Law.. The Challenge of Implementation [C]. Hague: Kluwer Law International,1996.
  • 8C. Raffensperger and J. A. Tickner (eds.). Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle [C]. Washington: Island Press, 1999.
  • 9J. Morris (ed.). Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle[C]. Oxford.. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000.
  • 10乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会[M].南京:译林出版社,2004.25—28.

二级参考文献1

  • 1闫维毅 任政 王华.基因经济:分割绿色黄金[M].北京:中国广播电视出版社,2001.156.

共引文献230

同被引文献231

引证文献23

二级引证文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部