摘要
目的对比分析复方沙棘籽油栓及消糜栓对宫颈糜烂的治疗效果。方法随机将176例宫颈糜烂患者分为治疗组86例,对照组90例,治疗组采用复方沙棘籽油栓,对照组采用消糜栓。结果两种方法治疗宫颈糜烂,疗效差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论复方沙棘籽油栓与消糜栓比较,治疗宫颈糜烂,疗效显著。
Objective： To analyze the effect of compound hippophae rhamnoides seed oil and in the treatment of cervical erosion. Methods： 176 patients with cervical erosion were randomly divided into two groups. 86 in experimental group, and 90 in control group, who were treated with compound hippophae rhamnoides seed oil suppository and erosion - removal suppository respectively. Results： The difference of therapeutic efficacy of the two methods in the treatment of cervical erosion is significant （ P 〈 0.05}. Conclusions： Compared with erosion- removal suppository, compound hippophae rhamnoides seed oil suppository has a significant effect for the treatment of cervical erosion.
出处
《现代中医药》
CAS
2006年第5期45-46,共2页
Modern Chinese Medicine
关键词
复方沙棘籽油栓
消糜栓
宫颈炎
宫颈糜烂
compound hippophae rhamnoides seed oil suppository
erosion- removal suppository
cervicitis
cervical erosion
