期刊文献+

Determination of respiration, gross nitrification and denitrification in soil profile using BaPS system 被引量:14

Determination of respiration, gross nitrification and denitrification in soil profile using BaPS system
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 A facility of BaPS (Barometric Process Separation) was used to determine soil respiration, gross nitrification and denitrification in a winter wheat field with depths of 0-7, 7--14 and 14-21 cm. N2O production was determined by a gas chromatograph. Crop root mass and relevant soil parameters were measured. Results showed that soil respiration and gross nitrification decreased with the increase of soil depth, while denitrification did not change significantly. In comparison with no-plowing plot, soil respiration increased significantly in plowing plot, especially in the surface soil of 0-7 cm, while gross nitrification and denitrification rates were not affected by plowing. Cropping practice in previous season was found to affect soil gross nitrification in the following wheat-growing season. Higher gross nitrification rate occurred in the filed plot with preceding crop of rice compared with that of maize for all the three depths of 0-7, 7-14 and 14-21 cm. A further investigation indicated that the nitrification for all the cases accounted for about 76% of the total nitrogen transformation processes of nitrification and denitrification and the N2O production correlated with nitrification significantly, suggesting that nitrification is a key process of soil N2O production in the wheat field. In addition, the variations of soil respiration and gross nitrification were exponentially dependent on root mass (p〈0.00l). A facility of BaPS (Barometric Process Separation) was used to determine soil respiration, gross nitrification and denitrification in a winter wheat field with depths of 0-7, 7--14 and 14-21 cm. N2O production was determined by a gas chromatograph. Crop root mass and relevant soil parameters were measured. Results showed that soil respiration and gross nitrification decreased with the increase of soil depth, while denitrification did not change significantly. In comparison with no-plowing plot, soil respiration increased significantly in plowing plot, especially in the surface soil of 0-7 cm, while gross nitrification and denitrification rates were not affected by plowing. Cropping practice in previous season was found to affect soil gross nitrification in the following wheat-growing season. Higher gross nitrification rate occurred in the filed plot with preceding crop of rice compared with that of maize for all the three depths of 0-7, 7-14 and 14-21 cm. A further investigation indicated that the nitrification for all the cases accounted for about 76% of the total nitrogen transformation processes of nitrification and denitrification and the N2O production correlated with nitrification significantly, suggesting that nitrification is a key process of soil N2O production in the wheat field. In addition, the variations of soil respiration and gross nitrification were exponentially dependent on root mass (p〈0.00l).
出处 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2006年第5期937-943,共7页 环境科学学报(英文版)
基金 The Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. KZCX1-SW-01-13)
关键词 soil respiration gross nitrification DENITRIFICATION Barometric Process Separation (BaPS) soil respiration gross nitrification denitrification Barometric Process Separation (BaPS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献51

  • 1HUANG Yao, LIU Shi-liang, SHEN Qi-rong and ZONG Liang-gang( College of Resource and Environmental Sciences , Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095 ,Institute of Atmospheric Physics , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100029 ).Model Establishment for Simulating Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics[J].Agricultural Sciences in China,2002,1(3):307-312. 被引量:6
  • 2孙文娟,黄耀,陈书涛,杨兆芳,郑循华.作物生长和氮含量对土壤-作物系统CO_2排放的影响[J].环境科学,2004,25(3):1-6. 被引量:47
  • 3崔玉亭,韩纯儒,卢进登.集约高产农业生态系统有机物分解及土壤呼吸动态研究[J].应用生态学报,1997,8(1):59-64. 被引量:63
  • 4Franzen L G Can. The earth afford to lose the wetlands in the battle against the increasing greenhouse effect[A]. International Peat Society Proceedings of International Peat Congress[C]. Uppsala, 1992,1-18.
  • 5Bartlett K B, Harriss R C. Review and assessment of methane emissions from wetlands[J]. Chemosphere, 1993, 26:61-320.
  • 6Cicerone R J, Oremland R S. Biogeochemical aspects of atmospheric methane[J]. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 1988, 2: 299-327.
  • 7Khalia M A K, Shearer M J, Rasmussen R A. CH4 sink and distribution in atmospheric CH4: Sources, sink, and role in global change[A]. NATO ASI Series[C]. Khalil M A K. New York: Springer-Veriga, 1993a, 113:168~179.
  • 8Gorham E. Northern peatlands: Role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming[J]. Ecol. Appl., 1991, 1:182-195.
  • 9Oechel W C, Vourlitis G L, Hastings S J, Bochkarev S A. Change in arctic CO2 flux over two decades: Effects of climate change at Barrow, Alaska[J]. Ecol. Appl., 1995, 5:846-855.
  • 10Roulet N, Bhardwaj A, Comer N, et al. Modelling biospheric-climatic feedbacks in peatland ecosystems[A]. Presentation to impacts of climate change to Inland wetlands: a Canadian Perspective[C]. Oak Hammock Marsh Conservation Centre, Stonewall, Manitoba, 1

共引文献110

同被引文献198

引证文献14

二级引证文献139

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部