期刊文献+

人性的哲学修订量表用于中国大学生的信度效度研究 被引量:14

The Reliability and Validity of Revised Philosophies of Human Nature Scale in Chinese College Students
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨人性的哲学修订量表的信度和效度。方法:用人性的哲学修订量表调查驻济四所高校的1155名本科1 ̄4年级大学生,评定该量表的内部一致性、重测信度、结构效度和效标效度。结果:人性的哲学修订量表具有较好的信度和效度,量表总分及两个因子的Cronbachs’α系数均达0.7以上,验证性因素分析表明测量数据与量表结构拟合良好。结论:人性的哲学修订量表可用于评定我国大学生人际信任度。 Objective: To explore the reliability and validity of Revised Philosophies of Human Nature Scale. Methods: 1155 college students from four universities in Ji'nan were administrated Revised Philosophies of Human Nature Scale. The internal reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity and criterion validity were examined. Results: The Revised Philosophies of Human Nature scale had sound reliability,and the validity was satisfying. The Cronbach's α coefficients were larger than 0.7. Confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit between the data and the construct of scale. Conclusion: The Revised Philosophies of Human Nature Scale could be used to assess trust of interpersonal relationships of Chinese college students.
作者 简佳 唐茂芹
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 2006年第4期347-348,351,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 人性的哲学 信度 效度 Philosophies of human nature Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1汪向东 王希林 马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12:217-217.
  • 2Wrightsman LS.Measurement of human nature.Psychological Reports,1964,14:743-751
  • 3张雅明,曾盼盼,俞国良.中小学生心理健康量表的信效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(1):6-8. 被引量:29
  • 4Hu L,Bender PM.Fit indices in covariance structure modeling:Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.Psychological Methods,1998,3:424-453

二级参考文献9

共引文献2911

同被引文献136

引证文献14

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部