期刊文献+

实证研究股权分置改革中的政策与策略 被引量:36

The Policies and Strategies for the Share Merger Reform
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以2005年初步完成股权分置改革的227家公司为样本,实证研究股权分置改革中政府的宏观政策设计和企业的微观策略问题,即股改公司的选择问题和对价的影响因素。在宏观层面上,我们发现,初步完成股改和尚未股改的上市公司在股权结构和盈利性方面存在着较为明显的差异;即使是已经完成股改的上市公司,在这两个指标上也存在着批次间的差异;我们还发现先期完成股改的上市公司在地域、行业上的分布也不均衡。我们认为,上述差异是监管部门的行为模式决定的。在微观层面上,我们选取五组变量进行分析并考察它们对得股率的影响。回归结果表明,上市公司的非流通股比例和首次发行(IPO)市盈率对得股率有显著的正面影响,而上市公司当前的盈利水平和流通股股权集中程度则对得股率有显著的负面影响。这些结果说明企业在制订股改方案时采取了一定的策略,全面考虑了公司的财务状况、股市表现且平衡了各方利益。 Based on the sample of listed firms, which have completed the share merger reform by the end of 2005, the paper empirically studies the macro policy design and micro firm strategy in the reform. From the macro perspective, it is found that reformed firms and non - reform firms have significant differences in the ownership structure and profitability, even in the reformed firms. In addition, reformed firms are not evenly distributed in the region and industry. The conclusion is that these differences are determined by the policy design of regulatory departments. In' the micro perspective, we investigate five classes of variables and their effects on the give - out ratio. The regression results suggest that the non - tradable ratio and price - to - earning ratio in IPO have significantly positive effects on the give -out ratio, but the firm profitability and ownership concentration of tradable shares have significantly negative effects on the give - out ratio. These findings indicate that listed firms employ some strategies in preparing the scheme of sham merger reform by balancing the financial condition, market performance and the interest of stakeholders.
出处 《金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第8期1-19,共19页 Journal of Financial Research
关键词 股权分置改革 对价 得股率 share merger reform, consideration, give - out ratio.
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1胡一帆,宋敏,张俊喜.竞争、产权、公司治理三大理论的相对重要性及交互关系[J].经济研究,2005,40(9):44-57. 被引量:127
  • 2王晓坤,夏乐,张俊喜.《纵观股市反应:股权分置改革成功吗?》学术论文.香港大学,2006..
  • 3....中国股权分置改革专网.新浪网财经频道 http://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/chinaggzw/index.shtml,,2006..
  • 4Chen,Zhiwu and Xiong Peng, 2001. Discounts on illiquidity stocks: evidence from China, Working Paper, Yale University.
  • 5Longstaff, Francis A. , 1995. How much can marketability affect security values? Journal of Finance 50, 1767 -74.
  • 6Roland,G. ,2000. Transition and economics: politics, markets and finns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • 7Silber, William L. , 1991. Discounts on restricted stock: the impact of iUiquidity on stock prices. Financial Analysts Journal,July - August, 60 - 64.
  • 8证监会《上市公司股权分置改革管理办法》.
  • 9《上海证券交易所权证业务管理暂行办法》.
  • 10《深圳证券交易所权证业务管理暂行办法》.

二级参考文献8

共引文献126

同被引文献409

引证文献36

二级引证文献361

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部