摘要
目的对比和分析普鲁卡因与垂体后叶素两种方法治疗老年肺结核并中、大咯血的止血效果、禁忌证和不良反应。方法观察组：普鲁卡因300mg加入5％葡萄糖或生理盐水500ml中静脉滴注，15～20滴／min，每天2次，维持至咯血停止后72h；对照组：垂体后叶素10～20u加入5％葡萄糖500ml中静脉滴注，15～20滴／min，每天2次，维持至咯血停止后72h。结果普鲁卡因组止血效果显著高于脑垂体后叶素组（P〈0．05），而且脑垂体后叶素组禁忌证及不良反应显著高于普鲁卡因组（P〈0．005）。结论普鲁卡因比垂体后叶素更适宜于治疗老年肺结核中、大量咯血。
Objective To compare and analyze the hemostases effects, contraindication and side effects of procaine and pituitrin in the treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis secondary middle and large haemoptysis of the age. Methods The observation group：to mix procaine（300mg） with glucose（5 % ） for intravenous drip, 15-20gtt/ min twice a day. It was maintained 72 hours after the haemoptysis stops. The comparative group： to mix （pituitrin 10 20U） with glucose（5 % ） for intravenous drip, 15 - 20gtt/min twice a day. It was maintained 72 hours after the haemoptysis stops. Results The procaine group had a better hemostatic effect than the pituitrin group; While the pituitrin group had more tangible contraindication and side effects. Conclusion Procaine is more suitable than pituitrin for the treatment for pulmonary haemoptysis of the aged.
出处
《中国基层医药》
CAS
2006年第7期1094-1096,共3页
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词
老年人
结核
肺
咯血
普鲁卡因
垂体后叶素
Aged
Tuberculosis, pulmonary
Haemoptysis
Procaine
Pituitrin
