期刊文献+

中国地震烈度表中物理标准取值研究与建议 被引量:5

Research and suggestion of extent value of physical measure in seismic intensity scale of China
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过比较基于中国烈度表绘制的集集地震烈度等震线、地震动峰值加速度和峰值速度等值线的相似度,发现中国烈度表中的这两个地震动峰值参数对应于7、8、9度区的数值范围偏低.后参照烈度等震线从视觉上找出与它最相似的PGA、PGV等值线,通过数字化比较和描述统计分析发现,新的地震动峰值参数等值线较基于中国烈度表物理标准取值范围而绘制的等值线与烈度等震线更为相似.由此得出了研究建议的对应于中国烈度表中7、8、9、10度区的PGA和PGV取值范围,其中7、8、9度区的参数值需要提高以保障抗震设计的安全性. Based on the comparison of isoseismal of seismic intensity for Chi - Chi Earthquake with the isoseismal of PGA and PGV it was found that the extent value of PGA and PGV in seismic intensity scale of China inclines to be small. Then according to the isoseismal of seismic intensity, the isoseismals of PGA and PGV with best similarity with the isoseismal of seismic intensity were selected. After that, the digital comparison and statistics of these isoseismals were conducted to find that the new isoseismals of PGA and PGV are more similar with the isoseismal of seismic intensity than the isoseismals on the seismic intensity scale of China. Hence, the new extent value of physical measure in seismic intensity scale of China is suggested and it is commended that the extent value of PGA and PGV corresponding to intensity 7,8,9 should be increased so as to insure the safety of structures with aseismatie design.
作者 郝敏 谢礼立
出处 《哈尔滨工业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第7期1041-1044,共4页 Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology
基金 教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20030213042) 黑龙江省自然科学基金重点资助项目(ZJG03-03)
关键词 烈度等震线 PGA等值线:PGV等值线 烈度物理标准 isoseismal of seismic intensity isoseismal of PGA isoseismal of PGV physical measure of seismic intensity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1WOOD H O, NEUMANN F. Modified mercalli intensity scale of 1931 [ J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1931,21:277 -283.
  • 2GB/T17742—1999.中国地震烈度表[S].
  • 3GRUNTHAL G. European Macroseismic Scale 1998[ M ]. Luxembourg: Imprimerie Joseph Beffort, 1999.
  • 4郝敏,谢礼立,徐龙军.关于地震烈度物理标准研究的若干思考[J].地震学报,2005,27(2):230-234. 被引量:37
  • 5刘恢先.《中国地震烈度表(1980)》说明书[A].刘恢先地震工程学论文集[C].北京:地震出版社,1994.111~126.
  • 6TSAI K C, HSIAO C P, BRUNEAU M. Overview of building damages in 921 Chi - Chi earthquake [ J ].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology,2000. 2 (1):93-108.
  • 7台弯内政建筑研究所.921集集大地震建筑物震害调查初步报告[R].台北:台湾内政建筑研究所,2000.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Kazi R Karim, Fumio Yamazaki. 2002. Correlation of JMA instrumental seismic intensity with strong motion parameters [J]. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 31:1191~1212.
  • 2Luis C, Belen B, Miguel H. 1997. An approach to the measurement of the potential structural damage of earthquake ground motions[J]. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 26:79~92.
  • 3Neumann F. 1960. A broad formula for estimating earthquake forces on oscillators[A]. In: Gakujutsu, Bunken, FukyuKai eds. Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering[ C]. Tokyo.. Science Council of Japan, 849~862.
  • 4Omori F. 1900. Seismic experiments on the fracturing and overturning of columns[J]. Publ Earthq Invest Comm, 4: 69~141.
  • 5谢毓寿.地震烈度表.土木工程学报,1958,5(2):73-85.
  • 6Benioff H. 1934. The physical evaluation of seismic destructiveness[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 24(4): 398~403.
  • 7Elenas A, Meskouris K. 2001. Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of struc tures[J]. Engineering Structure, 23.. 698~704.
  • 8Goodman L E, Rosenblueth E, Newmark N M. 1955. A seismic design of firmly founded elastic structures[J]. Trans ASCE, 120:782~801.
  • 9Grunthal G. 1998. European Macroseismic Scale 1998[M]. Luxembourg: Imprimerie Joseph Beffort, 1~32.
  • 10Housner G W. 1961. Vibration of Structures Induced by Seismic Waves, Shock and Vibration Hand Book[M]. Colum bus: McGraw Hill Book Company Inc, 1~32.

共引文献43

同被引文献122

引证文献5

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部