期刊文献+

PRBs与P&T技术处理地下水污染的比较研究 被引量:6

Comparative Research on In-Situ Treatment Technology of Groundwater with PRBs and P&T
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于地下水污染控制与治理的方法很多,其中抽出-处理技术(P&T)是目前应用最广泛、成熟化程度最高的技术,而渗透反应格栅(PRBs)技术是最新的处理技术,该技术在欧美已得到广泛应用。从不同角度对这2种技术进行比较,并对地下水污染处理时方法选择的影响因素和注意问题等进行研究,旨在说明渗透反应格栅技术在处理地下水污染过程中的重要性,推动该技术在我国的应用与发展,加速我国地下水污染控制与就地修复处理。 Currently many good methods of the control and treatment of groundwater is concerned. The P&T (Pump-and-Treat) technique is the most widely used and mature among them, while the PRBs (Permeable Reactive Barriers) technique is the most advanced treatment technique, which has been widely applied in Europe and US. In this article, the comparisons between the two techniques were made from different angles, and research on the influencing factors and existing problems in choosing methods of groundwater-pollution treatment was carried out. The work was aimed at illustrating the importance of PRB in treatment of groundwater pollution so as to promote its application and development in our country, and hasten control and in situ remediation and treatment of groundwater pollution of our country.
出处 《安徽农业科学》 CAS 北大核心 2006年第13期3142-3145,共4页 Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基金 国家科技部国际科技合作重点项目"减轻巢湖富营养化项目"(2005DFA90390)
关键词 抽出-处理 渗透反应格栅(墙) 就地恢复 地下水污染 Pump-and-Treat Permeable reactive barriers In-Situ remediation Comparative research
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1钟佐叅.地下水有机污染控制及就地恢复技术研究进展(一)[J].水文地质工程地质,2001,28(3):1-3. 被引量:20
  • 2FETIER C W. Contaminants hydrogeology[M]. NY : Macmil-lan Publishing Company, 1993:1-25.
  • 3SIMON F G, MEGGYES T, MCDONALD C. Current R&D needs tailored projects for solving technical, economic, administrative and other issues concerming permeable reactive barrier implementation in Germany[ C ]//The Netherlands:Giesbeek EM,2002:44 - 73.
  • 4JAVANDEL LCF,TSANG. Capture zone type curves[J]. Ground Water, 1998,35 (2) :305 - 311.
  • 5Report on the workshop held at the Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM). In-situ reactive barriers versus pump-and-treat methods for goundwater remediation[ C]//Bertin: [s. n] ,2001 : 18 - 19.
  • 6钟佐燊,刘菲.地下水有机污染控制及就地恢复技术研究进展(三)[J].水文地质工程地质,2001,28(5):76-79. 被引量:27
  • 7OOSTRON M,HOPSTEE C,WALKER RC,et al. Movement and remediation of PCE in a saturated heterogeneous porous mediuml[J]. Spill Behavior and Initial Dissolution, 1998b,48:138 - 150.
  • 8ORTH W S, GILLOHAM R W. Dechlorination of trichloroethene in aqueous solution using Fe(0) [J]. Envim Sci Technol, 1996,30(1) :66 - 71.
  • 9SWAVEC T M,HORNEY D P. Reductive dechlorination of chlorinated ethenes by iron metal[C]//Presented at the 209th ACS National Meeting, Anaheim,CA. 1995:2 - 6.
  • 10UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA). Cost analyses for selected groundwater cleanup projects:punrp and treat systems and permeable reactive Barriers [ EB/OL]. [ 2001-02-13 ]. http://www.frtr. gov.

二级参考文献16

  • 1[1]Mackay, D. M. , J. A Cherry. Groundwater contamination: pump-and-treat remediation. Environmental Science and Technology, 1989,23(6) :630-636
  • 2[2]Beitinger E. Permeable treatment walls-design, construction and cost. NATO/CCMS pilot study 1998. Special Session, Treatment Walls and Permeable Reactive Barriers, U. S. EPA. Report No:542-R-98-003,1998, (229) :6-16
  • 3[3]Blowes D. W. Ptacek C. J, Cherry, J. A, Gillham, R. W, Robertson W. D. Passive remediation of groudwater using in situ treatment curtains. Geoenvironment 2000, Geotechnical Special Special Publication, ASCE, 1995, (46): 1588-1607
  • 4[4]R. C. Star, J. A. Cherry. In situ remediation of contaminat ed groundwater: the funnel-and-gate system. Joumal of Ground Water, 1994,32(3) :465-476
  • 5[5]Sheilds,M. S., M. J. Reagin,. Selection of pseudomonas cepacia strain constitutive for the degradation of trichloroethylene. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1992,58: 3977-3983
  • 6[6]Xu,Y, F.W. Schwartz. Immobilization of lead in groundwater with a reactive barrier system. Subsurface Restora tion Conference, Third International Conference on Groundwater Quality Research, Dallas, TX, 1992, June 21-24
  • 7[7]Burris, D. R., C. P. Antworth. In situ modification of an aquifer material in flow-through systems by cationic surfactant to enhance retardation of organic contaminants. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1992, 10:325-337
  • 8[8]Vogan ,J. L. The use of emplaced denitrifying layers to promote nitrate removal from septic effluent. M. Sc. The sis. Dept. of Earth Scienced, University of Waterloo, 1993
  • 9[9]Vogel T. M. Novel catalyses for reactive barriers. NATO/ CCMS pilot study 1998. Special Session, Treatment Walls and Permeable Reactive Barriers, U. S. EPA. Report No.: 542-R-98-003,1998, (229) :48-55
  • 10[10]Sivavec T. M, Mackenzie P. D, Homey D. P, Baghel S. S. Redox-Sctive media for permeable reactive barriers. Conference proceedings: International Containment Technology Conference, St. Petersberg, FI, USA. 1997, Feb. 912,753-759

共引文献72

同被引文献117

引证文献6

二级引证文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部