期刊文献+

腰椎滑脱症两种椎间融合方法的影像学比较

COMPARISON OF RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOMES OF TWO METHODS OF INTERVERTERBRAL FUSION FOR LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较腰椎滑脱椎弓根系统复位后,Prospacer融合和单纯植骨椎间融合在腰椎滑脱复位椎间融合内固定术后7 d、3个月和术后6个月的影像学变化。方法比较术后7 d、术后3个月和术后6个月腰椎正侧位片上滑脱间隙高度的丢失量和滑脱矫正的丢失量。结果术后随访6个月,经两组均数比较的t检验,两组在椎间隙高度丢失和滑脱矫正复位丢失方面均具有显著性差异,分别为P=0.028和P=0.012。结论腰椎滑脱复位椎间植骨融合内固定术后3个月和术后6个月时,影像学上Prospacer融合组在维持滑脱椎间隙高度和防止滑脱矫正丢失方面均优于单纯植骨融合组。 Objective To compare the radiographic outcomes of spondylolisthesis reduction between Prospacer fusion group and Bone grafting fusion group 7 days,3 months,6 months after Posterior Lumber Interbody Fusion (PLIF) and pedical screw fixation. Methods The loss of intervertebral height and reduction of spondylolisthesis in lumber radiograph were compared 7 days,3 months,6 months post-operatively. Results There were significant difference in the loss of interverterbral height and reduction of spondylolisthesis between the two groups (t-test, P = 0.028 and P = 0. 012, respectively). Conclusion Prospacer fusion group is better in radiograph than Bone grafting group in maintaining intervertebral height and reduction of spondylolisthesis 3 months and 6 months after operation.
出处 《河北医科大学学报》 CAS 2006年第4期254-256,321,共4页 Journal of Hebei Medical University
关键词 腰椎脱位 外科手术 放射摄影术 Lumbar vertebrae dislocations surgical procedures, operative radiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Keun Su Kim, Tai Ki Yang, Jung Chung Lee. Radiological changes in the bone fusion site after posterior lumber interbody fusion using carbon cages impacted with laminar bone chips:Follow-Up study over more than 4 years[J], Spine, 2005,30(6):655-660.
  • 2海涌,谭荣,邵水霖,陈晓明,马华松,邹德威,高音.腰椎后路椎间植骨融合术的临床比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2003,11(24):1680-1683. 被引量:19
  • 3Madan S, Boeree NR, Outcome of posterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis[J].Spine,2002,27(14): 1536-1542,
  • 4Nork SE, Hu SS, Workman KI, et al, Patient outcome after decompression and instrumented posterior spinal fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis [J], Spine, 1999, 24(6): 561-569.
  • 5赵新建,谭家驹,廖绪强,曾明,关宏业.腰椎滑脱的减压、内固定与融合术[J].中华骨科杂志,2002,22(2):72-75. 被引量:90
  • 6丁宇,阮狄克.下腰椎不同融合方法的即刻与疲劳后稳定性[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2002,12(5):348-351. 被引量:28
  • 7张为,丁文元,申勇,丛军,董玉昌,王云霞,孟宪国.360度环状融合内固定术治疗腰椎滑脱[J].河北医科大学学报,2005,26(2):102-104. 被引量:4
  • 8Rupert HJ,Dietl RH, Mstthias Krammer, et al. Pull out test with three lumbar interbody fusion cages[J]. Spine, 2002, 27(10): 1029-1036.
  • 9Kim Y. Prediction of mechanical behaviors at interfaces between bone and two interbody cages of lumbar spine segments[J]. Spine, 2001,26(13): 1437-1442.

二级参考文献24

  • 1邹德威,海涌,马华松,吴航滨,邵水霖,白克文,陈晓明.重度腰椎滑脱的治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,1998,18(5):259-262. 被引量:358
  • 2郭新辉,刘景发,朱青安,欧阳钧,钟世镇.两种Steffee术式治疗腰椎滑脱的生物力学分析[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,1996,14(2):149-151. 被引量:7
  • 3洪天禄,唐天驷,董天华.节段性不稳在脊椎滑脱症外科治疗中的临床意义[J].中华骨科杂志,1996,16(7):412-414. 被引量:86
  • 4王大伟,杨晓飞.腰椎椎体间植骨融合术[J].中国矫形外科杂志,1996,3(3):216-217. 被引量:2
  • 5唐天驷,钱忠来.腰椎崩裂和滑脱症[J].中华骨科杂志,1997,17(1):5-7. 被引量:138
  • 6Muschick M,Zippel H,Perka C.Surgical management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents[J].Spine,1997,22(17):2306-2342.
  • 7Jeffrey SF,Michael M,Harry NH,et al.Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal steonsis:A prospective,randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation[J].Spine, 1997,22(24):2807-2812.
  • 8Boss N,Marchesi D,Zuber K,et al.Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis by reduction and pedicle fixation:a 4-6 years follow-up study[J].J Spine, 1993,18(12):1655-1661.
  • 9Bergmark A.Stability of the lumbar spine.A study of mechanical engineering[J].Acta Orthop Scand, 1989,230(suppl):1-54.
  • 10胡有谷 党耕町 唐天驷.脊柱外科学[M](第二版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.1270-1271.

共引文献134

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部