期刊文献+

对立案与侦查关系的再认识 被引量:6

The Second Thoughts on the Relation Between Placing A Case on File and Investigation
原文传递
导出
摘要 刑事诉讼法规定了具有独立诉讼地位的立案程序,并将其作为侦查程序启动的一个前置程序。然而,由于现行的立案条件过高,而侦查机关又缺乏达到该"条件"所必须的"合法"手段,由此不仅严重影响了对犯罪的有效追诉,也容易滋生"立案不实"等问题。而且,它也根本无法有效防范侦查权的滥用。在刑事诉讼法的再修改这一大背景之下,需要突破长期以来对"立案是侦查的前提"这一不恰当的认识,并必须承认,不仅立案之前需要进行必要的侦查活动,立案本身实际上也只是侦查的一个有机组成部分。 The case filing procedure in China Criminal Procedure Law has its independent legislation status, and this procedure is also designed as a prepositive procedure for triggering the investigation procedure. But, provided that the current case filing standard is too strict, while the investigation bodies are lack of necessary “legal” measures to reach such standard, thus it not only fatally impacts the efficiency of crime prosecution, but also incurs a number of consequences such as “incorrect filing case”. Meanwhile, it also cannot carry out the legislative aim of preventing the abusing of investigation powers at all. Under the mainstream background of Criminal Procedure Law revision, we are required to give up the our long time incorrect understanding that “case filing shall be the precondition of the investigation”, actually, case filing itself shall be realized as one of the component parts of the investigation procedure.
作者 李奋飞
出处 《法学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第3期126-132,共7页 The Jurist
关键词 刑事立案 侦查程序 侦查权 司法审查 Criminal Case Filing Investigation Procedure Investigation Power Judicial Exmination
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献31

引证文献6

二级引证文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部