摘要
目的用中文版L iebow itz社交焦虑量表(LSAS)检测社交焦虑障碍病人(SAD)和健康人,了解男女因子分的性别差异。方法设SAD组和健康人组,分别进行LSAS的他评和自评,对有关数据进行t检验、χ2检验,重点比较两组因子分的性别差异。结果(1)两组LSAS总分比较SAD组明显高于健康人组,差异具有极显著性(t=26.339,p<0.005)。(2)自评和他评显著相关(r>0.90,p<0.01),害怕和回避显著相关(r>0.97,p<0.001)。(3)因子分的性别差异比较,女性无论是SAD组还是健康人组均以社会交往和在公共场合讲话的因子分高且差异均具有极显著性(χ2=15.97,p<0.01;χ2=29.04,p<0.001;χ2=7.90,p<0.01;χ2=17.97,p<0.001)。而男性则以被他人观察和在公共场合吃饮的因子分高,SAD组该两项男女比较差异无显著性(χ2=1.41,p>0.05;χ2=1.07,p>0.05)。健康人组该两项男女比较差异具有显著性(χ2=6.78,p<0.01;χ2=4.01,p<0.05)。结论LSAS适用于中国人群。他评和自评高度相关,可用于自评。社交焦虑障碍病人和健康人LSAS因子分比较存在性别差异。
Objective To explore sexual difference of factors by scoring the social anxiety disorder （SAD） and non-SAD cases with the Chinese version of Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale（LSAS）. Methods The SAD group and non-SAD group were measured with LASA by cliniclan-scoring and self-scoring respectively. Results ①The score of total scale in SAD group was higher than that of non-SAD group with statistical significance （ t = 26. 339 ,p 〈 0. 005 ） ;②Clinician-scoring and seff-scoring were closely correlated（ r 〉 0.90 ,p 〈 0.01 ） ; ③Scores of social communication and speaking in public were high and statistical significance in the female of two groups （x^2 = 15.97, p 〈 0.01 ; x^2 = 29.04, p 〈 0. 001 ; x^2 = 7.90,p 〈 0.01, x^2= 17.97 ,p 〈 0. 001 ）. While scores of being observed by others and eating in public were high in the male of two group. The sexual difference of the two factors was not significant in SAD group （ x^2 = 1.41 ,p 〉 0.05 ; x^2 = 1.07 ,p 〉 0.05 ）. But the difference was significant in non-SAD group. （ x^2 = 6.78, p 〈 0.01 ; x^2= 4.01 ,p 〈 0. 05 ）. Conclusion These findings support the use of the Chinese version of LSAS for social anxiety disorder among Chinese . It could be used for self-scorlng because clinician-scorlng and self-scoring were closely correlated The factor of LSAS in SAD patients and healthy persons exists sexual difference , so it should be treated distinctively.
出处
《川北医学院学报》
CAS
2006年第3期237-239,共3页
Journal of North Sichuan Medical College
