期刊文献+

侦查阶段犯罪嫌疑人权利保障探析 被引量:1

Analysis on Protecting the Criminal Suspect' Rights during the Investigation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 人权保障乃现代刑事诉讼之灵魂。我国刑事诉讼程序中存在的问题突出表现在侦查阶段中的刑讯逼供、超期羁押等严重侵犯犯罪嫌疑人权利的现象。从观念保障、权利保障、制度保障及物质保障等四个方面入手,保障犯罪嫌疑人在侦查阶段的诉讼权利。 The guarantee of Human rights is the soul of modem criminal litigation. Nowadays, in our country the outstanding problem during the procedure of litigation is that the phenomenon such as inquisition by torture,overtime detainment of the criminal suspect exists, and these actions have infringed upon the human rights of the criminal suspect seriously. In order to protect the litigation rights of the criminal suspect during the investigating period, four aspects are necessary, they are: idea guarantee, right guarantee,regulation guarantee and material guarantee.
作者 黄文臻
出处 《贵州工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第3期61-63,共3页 Journal of Guizhou University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 侦查 犯罪嫌疑人 权利保障 investigation of a crime criminal suspect right guarantee
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1[2]孙长永.沉默权制度的基本内容研究[M].诉讼法论丛.北京:法律出版社,2000,38.
  • 2王鑫.讯问犯罪嫌疑人时的诉讼权利告知[J].河南公安学刊,2001,(1):39.
  • 3杨宇冠.非法证据排除规则的例外[J].比较法研究,2003,17(3):59-71. 被引量:20

二级参考文献31

  • 1《刑事司法百科全书》,Free Press, 1983, p.715.
  • 2U.S.v. Calandra414 U.S. 338 (1973).
  • 3Gelbard v. United States, 408 U.S. 41, 92 S.Ct. 2357, 33 L. Ed. 2d 179 (1972).
  • 4Stone v. Power, 428 U.S. 465,96 S.Ct (1976).
  • 5U.S.v. Lean 468 U.S. 897 (1984).
  • 6III. v. Krull 480 U.S. 340, (1987).
  • 7Agnello v. United States ,269 U.S. 20,46 s. Ct. 4,70 L. Ed. 145 (1925).
  • 8Walder v. United States, 347 U.S. 62 (1954).
  • 9United States v. Havens ,446 U.S. 620,100 S. Ct. 1912,64 L, Ed. 2d 559 (1980).
  • 10Harris v. New York ,401 U.S. 222, 91S. Ct. 643, 28 L. Ed.2d 1 (1971).

共引文献19

同被引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部