摘要
“历史”在本质上是一种依赖于人的主观判断而存在的“书写”行为,不同的“书写”主体总是会导致变化多端的“历史”形态。现代中国文学史的“重写”,不能离开“虚构”的基本路线:一方面,文学史家必须作为历史的“见证人”说话,保持最大限度的“客观”与“公正”;另一方面,他又不得不作为历史的“预言家”说话,先验地裁决(假定)诸多无法充分证“实”或证“伪”的“历史现象”。
History is in nature a written act relying on subjective judgments. Therefore, different writers present different versions of history. The re-compilation of Literature History cannot do without makeup. On the one hand, the writer acts as a witness and he has to do his best to maintain impersonal and fair; on the other hand, he acts as a predictor and transcendentally determines numerous historical phenomena that cannot be proved.
出处
《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
北大核心
2006年第3期36-39,64,共5页
Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
新文学史
历史客体
历史叙述
re-compilation of Literature History
historical object
history narration
