摘要
与欧洲地区主义从中心到边缘的演进逻辑不同,东亚地区主义的发展进程主要是从边缘到中心。两种地区主义逻辑的不同决定了东亚无法像欧洲那样协调解决霸权干涉和大国对抗两大挑战。东亚要构建欧盟那样的地区安全共同体就必须寻找替代路径。在东亚不能沿袭欧洲路径协调解决两大挑战的情况下,暂时同步搁置或冻结霸权干涉和大国对抗问题,或许是一条现实可行的东亚之路。
Unlike the evolving logic of European regionalism that is from the center to the periphery, the process of regionalization in East Asia is from the periphery to the center. Such a difference determines that East Asia cannot directly follow the European way to address in concert the challenges of external hegemonic interference and internal great power rivalry. To build an EU-like regional security community, East Asia must seek its own alternatives. Given that East Asia cannot follow the EU model, it will be both practical and viable for East Asia to temporarily shelve or freeze both hegemonic interference and great power rivalry, building its own regional security framework.
出处
《世界经济与政治》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第6期38-44,共7页
World Economics and Politics
