摘要
倪梁康探讨了现象学背景中意向性问题发端和展开的历史，指出其以意识分析的方式，折射出20世纪西方哲学史从知识论理论哲学向伦理学、政治学、社会学等实践哲学的过渡；张志林指出，分析哲学和现象学面对意向性这一相同的主题，以不同的概念构架和研究方法展示了不同的风格；孙周兴研究了早期海德格尔正是借助“意向性”才获得了真正的“实事域”，并从视域到世界、从理论化到生命体验、从关联意义到实行意义，在意向性问题上作了诸多推进；张志扬尝试从不囿于二值逻辑的检讨方式，即超出现象学和分析哲学的第三种视角，解读意向性问题及其在元典中的表迭。
Ni Liangkang looks into the historical development of intentionality against the background of phenomenology. He points out that such development reflects the transition from epistemologieal theoretieal philosophy to practical philosophy such as ethics, polities and sociology, etc. Zhang Zhilin points out that analytic philosophy and phenomenology demonstrates different styles in face of the same topic of intentionality, but within different frameworks and by different research methods. Sun Zhouxing indicates that early Heidegger got into ＇the horizon of things＇ and greatly furthered the research of intentionality from the perspectives of the horizon to the world, from theory to living experience, from the correlative meaning to fulfilling meaning. By getting rid of the dual-logical thought frameworks, that is, from a third perspective which transcends both phenomenologieal and analytic philosophical perspectives, Zhang Zhiyang attempts to probe into the problem of intentionality and make it clear in original text.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第6期47-50,共4页
Academic Monthly
关键词
意向性
现象学
分析哲学
intentionality, phenomenology, analytic philosophy
