期刊文献+

子宫肌瘤剔除术3种术式的临床比较 被引量:9

Clinical comparison of three kinds of myomectomy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨阴式子宫肌瘤剔除术的可行性、临床效果和安全性。方法回顾性分析2003年1月至2005年6月间我院阴式子宫肌瘤剔除术患者40例(阴式组)、同期腹式子宫肌瘤剔除术患者40例(对照组)及腹腔镜肌瘤剔除术患者40例的临床资料,比较手术效果和术后恢复情况。结果平均手术时间、术中平均出血量阴式组为(56±17)m in、(199±109)m l,腹式组为(57±20)m in、(169±136)m l、腹腔镜组为(73±31)m in、(139±95)m l,3组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)而阴式组患者术后的平均排气时间(1.6±0.6)d,术后平均住院时间(4.3±0.6)d,明显短于对照组腹式组(1.7±0.8)d、(6.5±1.3)d和腹腔镜组(1.4±0.7)d、(5.6±1.2)d,3组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论阴式子宫肌瘤剔除术手术效果好,创伤小,手术并发症少,康复快,是一种值得推广的微创手术。 Objective To evaluate the feasibility, Clinical effect and safety of vaginal myomectomy. Method From January 2003 to June 2005,40 cases treated by vaginal myomectomy were analyzed as the study group, and 40 cases treated by abmdominal myomectomy and 40 cases treated by lyparascopy myomectomy during the same period in our hospital were selected as the control group. Effects of operation and recovery of three groups were compared. Restilts There were no significant differences in the mean operating time, blood loss during operation between the study group, (56 ± 17) minutes, ( 199 ± 109) ml and abdominal myomectomy ( 57 ± 20) min, ( 169± 136 ) ml, lyparascopy myomectomy (73 ± 31 ) min, (139 ± 95 ) ml. In the study group, the mean recovery time of bowel function (1.6 ± 0.6 ) d home and average postoperative hospital stay (4.3 ±0. 6 ) days, were shorter than that of in the control group. Abdominal myomectomy ( l. 7 ± 0.8) days, (6.5 ± 1.3 ) days, lyparascopy alyomectomy ( 1.4 ±0, 7 ) days, ( 5.6 ± 1.2) days. For three groups, menorrhagia were relieved after six months' follow-up, patients in the study group recovered more rapidly and felt more satisfied with the effect of operation than those in the control group. Conclusion Vaginal myomectomy can be performed in selected patients with minimum operative injury, lower complications and better short short-time effect.
出处 《中国临床保健杂志》 CAS 2006年第3期226-228,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Healthcare
关键词 子宫肌瘤 子宫切除术 阴道式 对比研究 Uterine neoplasms Hysterectomy, vaginal Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献21

  • 1郁菌华.子宫肌瘤剔除术154例临床分析.中华妇产科杂志,1984,19(2):78-78.
  • 2Magos AL, Bournas N, Sinha R, et al. Vaginal myomectomy. Br J Obstet Gynecol, 1994,101 (4) : 1092-1098.
  • 3Davies A, Hart R, Magos AL. The excision of uterine fibroids by vaginal myomectomy: a prospective study. Fertil Steril, 1999, 71(6) :961-962.
  • 4LaMorte AI, Boumas N, Sinha R, et al. Morbidity associated at abdominal myometomy. Obstet Gynecol, 1993,72 (6) : 897-901.
  • 5Dubuisson JB,Charpron C, Levy. L. Difficulties and complications of laparoscopic myomectomy. J Gynecol Surg, 1996,12 ( 1 ) : 159-163.
  • 6Baker CM, Winkel CA, Subramanian S, et al. Estimated costs for uterine artery embolization and abdominal myomectomy for uterine leiomyomata:a comparative study at a single institution[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol,2002,13(12):1207-1210.
  • 7Stewart EA, Faur AV, Wise LA, et al. Predictors of subsequent surgery for uterine leiomyomata after abdominal myomectomy[J].Obstet Gynecol,2002,99:426-432.
  • 8Razavi MK, Hwang G, Jahed A, et al. Abdominal myomectomy versus uterine fibroid embolization in the treatment of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2003,180(6):1571-1575.
  • 9Dubuisson JB, Charpron C, Levy L. Difficulties and complications of laparoscopic myomectomy[J].J Gynecol Surg,1996,12:159-165.
  • 10Al-Fozan H, Dufort J, Kaplow M, et al. Cost analysis of myomectomy, hysterectomy, and uterine artery embolization[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002,187(5):1401-1404.

共引文献284

同被引文献52

引证文献9

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部