期刊文献+

近代中国外债研究中的中外学者本位差距

Chinese and Foreign Scholars' Standard Disparity on Modern Chinese Foreign Debt Research
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 从学术史回顾、研究取向的差异、外债与经济关系判断的差距探讨民族本位意识在史学研究中的潜在影响,指出这种民族本位意识既是现实政治环境的产物,同时也与历史上的民族主义思想有关。 Because of the influence of the nation - based way of thinking, there are obvious disparities between Chinese and foreign scholars' cognition on such aspects as motives for borrowing, foreign debt goals, the foreign debt influence and so on. By reviewing the history of academic research and taking into consideration the research -oriented differences as well as the judgment disparity of foreign debt and economic relations, this paper aims to probe into the potential impact of the nation - based consciousness on historical research, and further points out the fact that this kind of nationbased consciousness is not only the product of real political environment, but also of some links with the nationalistic thoughts in history.
作者 马陵合
出处 《安徽师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第3期334-339,共6页 Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
关键词 外债 近代中国 民族本位 foreign debt modern China nation- based consciousness
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]费正清.剑桥中华民国史:第一部[M].章建刚,等译.上海:上海人民出版社,1991.
  • 2雷麦.外人在华投资[M].北京:商务印书馆,1959.
  • 3肯特.中国铁路发展史[M].北京:三联书店,1958.
  • 4[4]欧弗莱区.列强在华财政控制[M].郭家麟,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1959.
  • 5吴景平.关于近代中国外债史研究对象的若干思考[J].历史研究,1997(4):52-72. 被引量:18
  • 6[6]Hou Chi-ming.Foreign Investment and Economic Development in China,1840-1937[M].New York:Harvard University Press,1965.
  • 7[7]费正清,刘广京.剑桥晚清史:下卷[M].中国社会科学院历史研究所编译室译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1993.
  • 8[10]梁启超.外资输入问题,饮冰室文集之十六[M].上海:中华书局,1932.
  • 9长舆.《立宪政治与舆论》[J].国风报,1910,(1):2-6.

共引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部