摘要
实证主义强调任何思想都必须能够接受事实经验的检验,事实经验是判别真理的客观标准,真理必须能够与事实经验相等同,而正是在这一点上,它与毛泽东强调经验事实的证明作用,有着某种契合之处。但是,从积极的实践观与消极的实践观的区别来看,毛泽东实践思想是不能与实证主义混为一谈的,将毛泽东实践思想做“实证主义”理解无疑具有理论局限性。
The interpretation of Mao Ze-dong＇s thought on practice as positivism may be accurate to some extent despite its limited significance. Positivism stresses that no thought can hold water unless it sustains the test of factual experience which serves as the objective criterion for determining truth. And truth must be equivalent to factual experience. In this respect, positivism is similar to Mao＇s thought on practice. However, in terms of differences between active practice and passive practice, we should not confuse Mao＇s thought with positivism.
出处
《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第3期57-62,共6页
Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences
关键词
毛泽东实践思想
实证主义
理解
实践
实证
MAO Ze-dong＇s thought on practice
positivism
interpretation
practice
proof
