摘要
规范阐明权的核心问题之一就是明确阐明权在民事诉讼中的适用范围,在我国阐明权的界限应当如下第一,对于大部分民商事案件,都应当适用阐明权;但是,对有关身份关系的诉讼、有关公益的诉讼、特别程序案件不适用阐明权。第二,阐明权适用的诉讼事项主要应是实体事项或者可以决定实体权利归属的程序事项。第三,阐明权适用于当事人,当事人的诉讼代理人,特殊情形下的案外人,以及有权启动再审程序的人。第四,阐明权的基准时通常应当是言词辩论终结时。
To rule power to clarify is to define its applicable limits in civil procedure, which is one of its main problems. In our country, its applicable limits should be as follows： First, the power is applicable to most civil cases except those related to parties＇ status, public good, and special procedure. Sccond, the power is applicable to the item which is the substantive or the procedural that can determine the substantive item. Third, the power is applicable to parties, the party＇s agent; persons out of the lawsuit in special situation and perkins who have right to start retrial. Fourth, the trite rion time of the power should be when the debate is close in civil procedure.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第3期82-92,共11页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
阐明权
界限
民事诉讼
power to clarify, limit, civil procedttre
