摘要
“肾衰公证”体现了药品不良反应案件的证明困境。法律上的因果关系证明不同于药学上的因果关系评价,要避免“龙胆泻肝丸”案件中的“肾衰公证”悖论,此类诉讼中应有条件地采用推定因果关系说。当原告初步证明药品使用与损害结果之间的盖然性后,法院推定因果关系成立,转由被告证明因果关系不成立。
＂Notarizing nephropathy＂represents dilemma of proving in adverse drug reaction. Legal causality is different from evaluation about causality in pharmacy.To avoid dilemma of ＂Notarizing nephropathy＂in cases about ＂Long-Dan-Xie-Gan-Wan＂ ,we should adopt the theory of presumption causation conditionally.As victim proves possibility of fact between drug defects and damage, causality is presumed, then drug producer proves contrarily no causation.
出处
《中国药物警戒》
2006年第3期131-134,共4页
Chinese Journal of Pharmacovigilance
关键词
药品不良反应
推定因果关系
盖然性
悖论
adverse drug reaction
presumption causation
possibility
dilemma
