摘要
质量评价是测绘产品生产过程中的一个重要环节。但长期以来用于地图产品质量评价的方法,存在着诸多的局限性,难以适应地图产品在形式和质量特点上的变化。目前,以模糊数学的原理为基础的模糊综合评价方法被认为是一种较好的方法,得到越来越多的关注。但对于两者之间的优劣比较,长期以来,仅仅停留在理论上的分析。本文针对这两种方法,不仅从理论上,而且以三个判据为基础,比较了它们的特点和存在的问题。
Quality assessment is an important step in surveying products manufacturing.But the methods that have being used for assessing the quality of maps till now have many defects,which make them difficult to meet maps'changes in form and quality characteristic.At present,fuzzy comprehensive assessment method is considered as a better method,and attracts more and more attention.But the research on the difference between those two methods is always just theoretical.This paper makes a comparison between their characteristics not just based on theory,but on three evidences.
出处
《测绘科学》
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第3期137-139,共3页
Science of Surveying and Mapping
关键词
模拟地图
数字地图
缺陷扣分
模糊综合评价
analogous map
digital map
scorn-diminution for defect
fuzzy comprehensive assessment
