期刊文献+

雌雄木蜂对活血丹盗蜜的行为差异及原因 被引量:5

Preliminary Study of the Causes and Pattern of Behavioural Differences Between Male and Female Carpenter Bees(Xylocopa sinensis) during Nectar Robbing in Glechoma longituba(Lamiaceae)
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过近三年的野外观察和实验揭示了活血丹的盗蜜者为中华木蜂.但其雌雄个体具有不同的访花特性和影响.雄蜂的体形稍小,访花频率是雌蜂的4倍,单花访问时间较雌蜂短(2.18 s/7.48 s),但在一个居群的单次访花数却是雌蜂的5倍(42.48/8.81),对被盗蜜花的损伤也较雌蜂低;在开放条件下,被雌雄木蜂访问过的花的座果率有明显差异(34.72%/73.59%).结果表明,体形大小的差异可能是活血丹的花冠管长度、硬度及单花产蜜量仅能适应雄蜂的盗蜜,不适应雌蜂盗蜜的主要原因,对食物资源的合理利用可能导致了中华木蜂雌雄个体在对活血丹的取食行为上发生了分化,并对其花部进化施加了不同的选择压力. Studies over three years in natural population shown that as nectar robbers of Glechoma longituba, male carpenter bee of Xylocopa sinensis is smaller than the female one. Moreover, detailed studies indicated that male and female bees have different behavior and effects when visiting flowers. For example, the visit frequency in a certain population for male bees was 4 times than that of female ones; average duration of single visit was shorter for male bees than female bees (2.18 s vs. 7.48 s), and the visited flower number during a bout for male individuals is significantly more than that of female individual (42.48 vs. 8.81). Consequently, the female bee resulted in higher extent of destruction on the corolla, ovule and nectary in comparison with male bee; fruit set from visited flowers due to male bees is significantly higher than female ones under opening condition (34. 72% vs. 73. 59%). We therefore postulated that the length, rigidity of corolla and nectar production of flower in G. longituba must be an adaptive consequence of its nectar robbing visitors; The behavior differentiation of Xylocopa sinensis during foraging may result from the difference pattern of distribution of the food resource for the male and female individuals.
出处 《武汉大学学报(理学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第2期235-240,共6页 Journal of Wuhan University:Natural Science Edition
基金 教育部博士点基金资助项目
关键词 传粉生态 中华术蜂 盗蜜者 活血丹 适合度 pollination ecology carpenter bee Xylocopa sinensis nectar robber Glechoma longituba fitness
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Inouye D W.The Ecology of Nectar Robbing[M]//Bentley B,Elias T.The Biology of Nectarines.New York:Columbia University Press,1983:153-173.
  • 2Maloof J E,Inouye D W.Are Nectar Robber Cheaters or Mutualists[J].Ecology,2000,81:2651-2661.
  • 3Macior W L.Foraging Behavior of Bombus (Hymenoptera:Apidae) in Relation to Aquilegia Pollination[J].Amer J Bot,1966,53:302-309.
  • 4Macior W L.The Pollination Ecology of Dicentra cucullaria[J].Amer J Bot,1970,57:6-11.
  • 5Macior W L.Co-Evolution of Plants and Animals-Systematic Insights from Plant-Insect Interactions[J].Taxon,1971,20:17-28.
  • 6Barrows E M.Nectar Robbing and Pollination of Lantana camara (Verbenaceae)[J].Biotropica,1976,8:132-135.
  • 7Barrows E M.Robbing of Exotic Plants by Introduced Carpenters and Honeybees in Hawaii,with Comparative Notes[J].Biotropica,1980,12:23-29.
  • 8Darwin C.The Effects of Cross and Self-Fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom[M].London:Murray,1876.
  • 9Maloof J E.The Ecological Effect of Nectar Robbers,with an Emphasis on the Reproductive Biology of Corydalis caseana[D].Maryland:College Park,University of Maryland,2000.
  • 10Newman D A,Thomson J D.Effects of Nectar Robbing on Nectar Dynamics and Bumblebee Foraging Strategies in Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae)[J].Oikos,2005,110:309-320.

共引文献2

同被引文献73

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部