期刊文献+

基于国际疾病分类编码的综合创伤评分方法研究及其在颅脑外伤患者中的应用效果评价 被引量:5

A new comprehensive trauma score method based on international classification of diseases and the effectiveness of its use in cerebral injured patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 建立一种基于国际疾病分类(ICD)编码的简易综合创伤评分方法,并评价其在颅脑外伤患者中的应用效果。方法借鉴国外成熟评分方法思路构建评分模型。采用接收者工作特征(ROC)分析方法评价新评分方法预测355例颅脑外伤患者结局的效果,并与专家的改良损伤严重度评分(NISS)进行比较。结果新评分方法的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.9254,95%可信区间0.8634-0.9875,与0.5比较P〈0.01;与两位专家的NISS评分之AUC比较P:0.4535,差异无统计学意义。结论基于ICD编码的综合创伤严重度评分(CISS)方法对创伤患者的结局具有较高的预测价值,且其操作成本低,可以作为一种理想的简易创伤评分方法。 Objective To develop a new comprehensive trauma score method based on international classification of diseases (ICD) and evaluate the effectiveness of its use in cerebral injured patients. Methods The model of the new trauma score method was constructed by referring to those of some certain comprehensive trauma score methods generally used around the world. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was employed to evaluate the effectiveness of outcome prediction for 355 cerebral injured patients using the new developed trauma score method. Statistical comparisons were performed between the AUC for the new trauma score values and that of NISS values derived from two professional raters. Results The area under the curve (AUC) for the new trauma score values was as large as 0. 925 4, whose 95% CI ranged from 0. 863 4 to 0.987 5, and is statistically different from 0.5 (P 〈 0.01 ). Statistical difference was not found between the AUC for the new trauma score value and that of NISS values of two raters ( P = 0. 453 5 ). Conclusion The new developed trauma score method, namely CISS method, which is considerably effective in predicting the outcomes of trauma patients and more cost-effective, can be used as an alternative for those commonly used ones.
出处 《中华创伤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第5期337-340,共4页 Chinese Journal of Trauma
基金 全军医药卫生科研基金资助项目(01G006)
关键词 创伤严重度评分 国际疾病分类 脑损伤 接收者工作特征分析 Trauma severity score International classification of diseases Brain injuries Receiver operating characteristics analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献20

  • 1金会庆,中华创伤杂志,1996年,12卷,171页
  • 2Cope WS, Champoin HR, Sacco WJ, et al. The injury severity score revisited[J] .J Trauma, 1988,28:69 - 77.
  • 3Osler T, Baker SP, Long W. A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring[ J ]. J Trauma, 1997,43:922 - 926.
  • 4Brenneman FD, Boulanger BR, McLellan BA, et al. Measuring injury severity:time for a change[J]? J Trauma, 1998,44:580- 582.
  • 5Balogh A, Offner PJ, Moore EE, et al. NISS predicts postinjury multiple organ failure better than the ISS[J] .J Trauma,2000,48:624- 627.
  • 6Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, et al. A new characterization of injury severity[J]. J Trauma, 1990,30: 539 - 548.
  • 7American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care. Medicine conference: definition for sepsis and organ failure and guideline for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis[J]. Crit Care Med, 1992,20:864- 974.
  • 8Deborah A, Debre L, Robert J, et al. Predictor of morality in adult trauma patients: the physiologic trauma score is equivalent to the trauma and injury severity score[J] .J Am Coll Surg,2002,194:695- 704.
  • 9Muckart DJ, Bhagwanjee S. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference definitions of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and allied disorders in relation to critically injured patients[J]. Crit Care Med, 1997,25:1789- 1795.
  • 10Smail N, Messiah A, Edouard A, et al. Role of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and infection in the occurrence of early multiple organ dysfunction sydrome following severe trauma[ J ]. Intensive Care Med,1995,31:813 - 816.

共引文献33

同被引文献102

引证文献5

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部