摘要
目的探讨二次腹膜外剖宫产术及预防并发症的可行性。方法将前次腹膜外剖宫产再次行腹膜外剖宫产的100例(腹膜外组),与同期再次腹膜内剖宫产的100例(腹膜内组)的手术时间、出血量、术后病率等进行比较。结果手术时间:腹膜外组平均45min,其中28例兼行输卵管结扎术,腹膜内组平均6min,其中36例兼行输卵管结扎术(P<0·05);出血量:腹膜外组平均141ml,腹膜内组平均235ml(P<0·05);术后病率:腹膜外组2%,腹膜内组24%(P<0·01)。结论再次腹膜外剖宫产优于再次腹膜内术式。
Objective To investigate the feasibihty of the second cesarean section by peritioneal exclusion and preventing the post operative complications . Methods 100 cases of the second cesarean section by peritonneal exclusion that fast extraperitoneal eaesarean section （peritoneal exclusion group） was carried out were compared with 100 eases of the second cesarean section by intraperitoneum （intraperitoneum group） . Compared variances were the average operative time, the blood volume, the post operative complications and so on. Results The average operative time were 45 min （ ligation of fallopian tube were operatived in 28 cases in peritoneal group） and 63 min （ligation of fallopian tube were opemtived in 36 cases in intraperitoneum group）, respectivelly （ P 〈 0.05）. The volume of blood were 141 ml and 235ml, respeetivelly （ P 〈 0.05）. The post operative complications were 2% and24% , respeetivelly （P〈0.01）. Conclusions The second cesarean section by peritoneal exclusion surpass the second cesarean section by intraperitoneum.
出处
《中国妇产科临床杂志》
2006年第3期194-195,共2页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词
剖宫产术
二次手术
腹膜外
cesarean section
second operate
extraperitoneal
