摘要
目的通过对中晚期喉癌患者行三种不同术式后的发音生存质量分析,指导喉癌治疗方案的选择。方法对30例喉次全切除患者、30例喉全切除未行发音重建患者、30例喉全切除行发音重建患者,采用修改后的美国密执安大学头颈癌患者生存质量量表(universityofMichiganheadandneckqualityoflife,HNQOL)进行问卷调查,分析三种不同术式患者的生存质量及生存质量随时间发展的变化规律。结果喉全切除行发音重建组在语言交流、嗅觉情况、社会交往及娱乐工作状态方面与喉次全切除组比较无显著性差异,而未行发音重建组与喉次全切除组有显著性差异。结论喉全切除行发音重建可明显提高术后的生存质量。应积极通过临床治疗,心理治疗及社会干预帮助其康复,提高术后生存质量。
OBJECTIVE To find the differences in QOL between patients treated with total laryngectomy with voice rehabilitation or without voice rehabilitation and subtotal laryngectomy, to analysis the factors affecting QOL of patients after laryngectomy by HNQOL. METHODS With HNQOL,a survey was conducted in patients treated with total laryngectomy （30cases） with voice rehabilitation, 30 cases without voice rehabilitation, and 30 cases treated with subtotal laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer. We discuss changes of QOL with time went by, and analysis the factors affecting QOL of patients after laryngectomy. RESULTS There is no difference between patients treated with total laryngectomy with .voice rehabilitation and the one treated with subtotal laryngectomy in their quality of life, however, there is difference between patients treated with total laryngectomy without voice rehabilitation and the one treated with subtotal laryngectomy. CONCLUSION Through voice rehabilitation ,we could advance quality of life of the patients treated with total laryngectomy. Through the integration of psychological, clinical and social intervention, the quality of life of patients may have an overall improvement.
出处
《中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科》
北大核心
2006年第3期141-144,共4页
Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
关键词
喉肿瘤
喉切除术
生活质量
Laryngeal Neoplasms
Laryngectomy
Quality of Life
