期刊文献+

大股东制衡机制与现金股利的隧道效应——来自1999—2003年中国上市公司的证据 被引量:111

Balance Mechanism of Blockholder and Tunneling of Cash Dividend: Evidences from Chinese Listed companies from 1999 to 2003
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 鉴于公司的财务行为受到公司治理因素的影响,本文从公司治理的角度,基于国内外的相关研究提出六个研究假设,然后构建回归模型,依据1999年—2003年中国上市公司数据进行假设检验,具体探讨前五大股东持股比例以及在此基础上大股东之间的监督制衡机制对于上市公司派发现金股利的影响,研究因为我国股市“同股同权不同价”的特殊现象而导致的现金股利的“隧道效应”,探索其中的影响机制和制衡机制。研究显示,前五大股东的持股比例、大股东控制力(或联合控制力)、大股东制衡度(或联合制衡度)对派发现金股利的“隧道效应”存在重要影响。本文最后给出五点建议,试图限制控股股东通过现金股利的“隧道效应”谋取私利,以保护中小股东的正当权益。 Due to the important influence of corporate governance on corporate financial behaviors and from an angle of corporate governance, we develop six hypotheses based on overseas and home relevant researches and data of Chinese listed companies from 1999 to 2003, and do hypotheses testes with regression models to examine the impact of share percent of top 5 shareholders and supervision and balance mechanism among bloekholders on cash dividend distribution of listed companies, and to explore influence and balance mechanisms in tunneling of cash dividend which derived from the special phenomena of "same shares same fights but different price". We find that share percent of top 5 shareholders, control ability (or combined control ability) and balance degree ( or combined balance degree) of bloekholders have important influence on tunneling of cash dividend distribution. Lastly, the paper proposes five suggestions to restrict controlling shareholders to enlist self-interests from tunneling of cash dividend and to protect rights and interests of small and medium shareholders.
出处 《南开经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期60-78,共19页 Nankai Economic Studies
基金 本文受国家自然科学基金项目(70272026)教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(04JJD630004)教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关项目(03JZD0018)等资助
关键词 大股东制衡 现金股利 隧道效应 公司治理 Blockhoder Balance Cash Dividend Tunneling Corporate Governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

二级参考文献27

  • 1唐松华.2002年深市上市公司利润分配状况分析[J].证券市场导报,2003(7):18-21. 被引量:5
  • 2管汝平.股份回购的管理[J].上市公司,1999,(5).
  • 3[5]Claessens, S., Djankov S., and Lang L.H.P., 2000, The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations, Journal of Financial Economics 58, 81-112.
  • 4[6]Fama, E. F. and K. R. French, Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay? Journal of Financial Economics 60, 2001, PP3-43.
  • 5[7]Grullon, G., Michaely, R., 2002. Dividends, Share Repurchases,and the Substitution Hypothesis. Journal of Finance, VOL. LVⅡ,NO.4, Aug. 2002.
  • 6[8]Jensen, M., Meckling, W., 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Bbehavior, Aagency Ccosts, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
  • 7[9]La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., 1999. Corporate Ownership Around the World. Journal of Finance 54, 471-517.
  • 8[10]Lee, C.J. and Xing Xiao, 2002, Cash Dividends and Large Shareholder Expropriation in China, working paper.
  • 9[11]Lintner, J., 1956, Distribution of Incomes of Corporations Among Dividends, Retained Earnings and Taxes, The American EconomicReview 46, 97, 113.
  • 10[12]Su, Dongwei, 2000, Corporate Finance and State Enterprise Reform in China, Working Paper.

共引文献742

同被引文献1505

引证文献111

二级引证文献1402

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部