期刊文献+

Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌术后辅助化疗疗效分析 被引量:8

Clinical observation of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery for stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:评价Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)切除术后辅助化疗疗效,并对影响术后辅助化疗的因素进行初步分析.方法:回顾性分析本院268例切除术后的Ⅲ期NSCLC,有94例于术后3~4周开始接受化疗(辅助化疗组),其中予以CAP方案化疗42例;EP方案化疗34例;NP方案化疗18例.在化疗组中化疗3~4周期56例;化疗4~6周期38例.另174例患者术后未行化疗(单纯手术组).结果:辅助化疗组和单纯手术组的5年生存率分别为27.6%和16.6%(P<0.05),差别有统计学意义.在辅助化疗组中行CAP、EP、NP方案化疗组的5年生存率分别为26.1%、26.4%和27.7%(P>0.05),而在化疗组中化疗3~4周期和化疗5~6周期患者的5年生存率分别为26.7%和28.8%(P>0.05).结论:对切除术后Ⅲ期NSCLC患者进行3~4周期,以顺铂为基础的化疗方案的辅助化疗,可以提高长期生存率. Objective:To evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery for stage m non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) and analyze the factor that influence the adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods :We analysed clinical data in 268 cases of stage Ⅲ NSCLC undergone resectional surgery. 94 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy after undergone radical surgery (adjuvant chemotherapy group). 174 patients received surgery alone( surgery group). In adjuvant chemotherapy group, 42 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with CAP regimen,34 patients with EP and 18 patients with NP. In adjuvant chemotherapy group, 56 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy for 3 or 4 cycles and 38 patients for 5 or 6 cycles. Results :The 5-year survival rate was 27.6% in the adjuvant chemotherapy group and 16.6% in the surgery group. There was significant discrepancy (P 〉 0. 05 ). The 5-year survival in CAP, EP and NP group were 26. 1% ,26. 6% and 27. 7% respectively, there was no significant discrepancy(P 〉 0. 05 ). The 5-year survival in 3 or 4 cycles patients were 26. 7% and the 5-year survival in 5 or 6 cycles patients were 28. 9% . there was no significant discrepancy(P〉0. 05). Conclusion:Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with platinum-based regimen for 3 or 4 cycles can improve survival rate for stage Ⅲ NSCLC patients.
出处 《临床肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2006年第3期173-175,共3页 Chinese Clinical Oncology
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 外科治疗 辅助化疗 生存率 Non-small-cell lung cancer Surgery Adjuvant chemotherapy Survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1杨学宁,吴一龙.美国NCCN临床指引介绍[J].循证医学,2002,2(4):242-242. 被引量:9
  • 2Maurizio Tonato.Final report of the adjuvant lung project italy (ALPI):an Italian? EORTC-LCG randomized trail of adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)[C].Proc ASCO,2002,Abstract:1157.
  • 3Chevalier TL,Pignon JP,Bergman B,et al.Results of the randomized international adjuvant lung cancer trail (1ALT):ciplatinbased chemotherapy(CT) vs no CT in 1867 patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)[J].Lung Cancer,2003,41 (52):3 -7.
  • 4C.Soria and T.Le Chevalier.Is cisplatin still the best platinum compound in non-small-cell lung cancer[J].Annals of Oncology,2002,13:1515-1517.
  • 5Kelly K,Crowley J,Bunn PA,et al.Randomized phase Ⅲ trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin in the retreatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer:a southwest oncology group trial[J].J Clin Oncol,2001,19(13):3210 -3218.
  • 6韩宝惠.晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗周期的新争议[J].中国肺癌杂志,2004,7(1):1-3. 被引量:4

二级参考文献11

  • 1[1]Stephens RJ, Fairlamb N, Gower N, et al. The Big Lung Trial (BLT): determining the value of cisplatin-based chemotherapy for all patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preliminary results in the supportive care setting. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2002,21:291a.
  • 2[2]Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study (ELVIS) Group. J Natl Cancer Inst,1999,91(1):66-72.
  • 3[3]Lilenbaum RC, Herndon JE, List M, et al. Single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a CALGB randomized trial of efficacy, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2002,21:1a.
  • 4[4]Scagliotti GV, De Marinis F, Rinaldi M, et al. Phase Ⅲ randomized trial comparing three platinum-based doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol,2002,20(21):4285-4291.
  • 5[5]Fossella FV, DeVore R, Kerr RN, et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol,2000,18(12):2354-2362.
  • 6[6]America Society of Clinical Oncology: Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol,1997,15(8):2996-3018.
  • 7[7]Smith IE, O'Brien ME, Talbot DC, et al. Duration of chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized trial of three versus six courses of mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin. J Clin Oncol,2001,19(5):1336-1343.
  • 8[8]Socinski MA, Schell MJ, Peterman A, et al. Phase Ⅲ trial comparing a defined duration of therapy versus continuous therapy followed by second-line therapy in advanced-stage ⅢB/Ⅳ non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol,2002,20(5):1335-1343.
  • 9[9]Socinski MA, Baggstrom MQ, Hensing TA. Duration of therapy in advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Adv Hemato Oncol,2003,1(1):33-38.
  • 10[10]DePierre A, Quoix E, Mercier M, et al. Maintenance chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study of vinorelbine versus observation in patient responding to induction therapy. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2001,20:309a.

共引文献11

同被引文献67

引证文献8

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部