期刊文献+

下腰椎不同融合方式的有限元研究 被引量:8

THE FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF LUMBAR FUSIONS
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 建立正常人L3~5节段有限元模型,研究腰椎椎体间、后外侧以及环形融合方式下融合节段的稳定性,融合相邻节段椎间盘应力的变化。方法选择一名32岁正常男性,采用CT扫描,借助CATIAV5和Marc/MSC.Mentat软件,建立正常人L3~5三维非线性有限元模型。通过模拟手术失稳及在此基础上的椎体间、后外侧及环形融合,建立相应的4种有限元模型。各模型施加载荷,观察其应力分布、融合节段的角位移变化及邻近节段椎间盘的最大有效应力。结果环形融合的稳定性优于椎体间融合与横突间融合,其中以前屈与后伸加载时尤为明显。除前屈外,椎体间融合的稳定性总体优于单纯横突间融合。融合邻近节段椎间盘的最大有效应力均出现于前屈时,然后依次为侧弯、扭转、后伸。椎体间融合时邻近椎间盘的最大有效应力增加最小,横突间融合次之,环形融合时最大。结论下腰椎后路减压后行融合术时,环形融合的稳定性最好,椎体间融合的稳定性优于横突间融合。椎体间融合引起邻近节段退变的可能性最小,环形融合可能性最大,而横突间融合介于二者之间。 Objective To investigate the stability and the stress distributions of L3-5 fused with three different approaches (interbody, posterolateral and circumferential fusions) and to investigate degeneration of the segment adjacent to the fused functional spinal unit. Methods A detailed L3-5 three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of a normal man aged 32 was established and validated. Based on the model, the destabilized model, the interbody, posterolateral and circumferential fusions models of L4-5 were established. After the loadings were placed on all the models, we recorded the angular motions of the fused segment and the Von Mises stress of the adjacent intervertebral disc. Results The circumferential fusion was most stable than the others, and the interbody fusion was more stable than the posterolateral fusion. The maximal Von Mises stress of the adjacent L3,4 intervertebral disc in all the models was ranked descendingly as flexion,lateral bending,torsion and extension. For the three kinds of fusions, the stress increment of the L3-4 intervertebral disc was ranked ascendingly as interbody fusion, posterolateral fusion and circumferential fusion. Conclusion After destabilization of the L4,5 segment, the stability of the circumferential fusion is better than that of the others, particularly under the flexional or extensional loading. The stability of the interbody fusion is better than that of the posterolateral fusion, except for under the flexional loading. The feasibility of adjacent segment degeneration can be ranked descendingly as: circumferential fusion,posterolateral fusion and interbody fusion.
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期400-403,共4页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 腰椎 脊柱融合 生物力学 有限元法 Lumbar spine Spinal fusion Biomechanics Finite element analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Goel VK,Kim YE,Lim TH,et al.An analytical investigation of the mechanics of spinal instrumentation.Spine,1988,13(9):1003-1011.
  • 2Chen CS,Cheng CK,Liu CL.A biomechanical comparison of posterolateral fusion and posterior fusion in the lumbar spine.J Spinal Disord Tech,2002,15(1):53-63.
  • 3董凡,侯筱魁.小关节在腰椎结构刚度中的作用[J].中华外科杂志,1993,31(7):417-420. 被引量:28
  • 4Freeman BJ,Licina P,Mehdian SH.Posterior lumbar interbody fusion combined with instrumented posterolateral fusion.5-year results in 60 patients.Eur Spine J,2000,9(1):42-46.
  • 5宋跃明,刘立岷,岑石强,龚全,李涛.USS复位固定、椎体间及后外侧植骨融合治疗腰椎滑脱症[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2004,14(11):691-693. 被引量:6
  • 6Madan SS,Harley JM,Boeree NR.Circumferential and posterol-ateral fusion for lumbar disc disease.Clin Orthop Relat Res,2003(409):114-123.
  • 7Madan SS,Boeree NR.Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion.Eur Spine J,2003,12(6):567-575.
  • 8Gillet P.The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion.J Spinal Disord Tech,2003,16(4):338-345.
  • 9胡明,马远征,郑光新,彭伟,才晓军.经后路腰椎椎间固定融合术后邻近节段发生椎间盘退行性变的5年随访[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(18):18-19. 被引量:7
  • 10Ghiselli G,Wang JC,Bhatia NN,et al.Adjacent segment degene-ration in the lumbar spine.J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2004,86(7):1497-1503.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Greenough CG,Taylon LJ,Fraser RD. Anterior lumbar fusion:a comparison of noncompensotion patients with compensation patients [J].Clin Orthop,1994,300:30-37.
  • 2Dubausset J. Treatment of sponelylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents[J].Clin Orthop,1997,337:77-80.
  • 3Zeong JG,Zu W,Zheng YG,et al. Comparison of the strengths of lumbosacral fixation achieved with techniques using one and two triangulated sacral screws [J].Spine, 1998,23 (21):2289-2294.
  • 4Zi YW, Zeong JC, Zu W, et al. A normal injustable bioactive bone ecment for spinal surgeny:a developmental and predinical study[J].J Biomed Mater Res,2000(S2):164-170.
  • 5Sedat Cagll,Neil RC,Volker KH,et al. Biomechanics of grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Part 2):treatment with threaded interbody cages,dowes and pedicle screws [J].J Neurosurg,2001,94(Spine 1 ) :51-60.
  • 6Satomi K, Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y, et al. A clinical study of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Radiographic analysis and choice of treatment. Spine 1992; 17:1329-36
  • 7Videman T, Nummi P, Battie MC, et al. Digital assessment of MRI for lumber disc desiccation. A comparison of digital versus subjective assessments and digital intensity profiles versus discogram and macroanatomic findings. Spine 1994; 19:192-8
  • 8Lee CK, Langrana NA. Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study. Spine 1984; 9:574-81
  • 9Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 1988; 13(3): 375 -7
  • 10Chow DH, Luk KD, Evans JH, et al. Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments. Spine 1996; 21: 549-55

共引文献38

同被引文献146

引证文献8

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部