期刊文献+

罗哌卡因与布比卡因用于腰麻硬膜外联合阻滞的效疗比较

A Comparison Between Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for Spinal-epidural Anaesthesia
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:比较0.75%盐酸罗哌卡因与0.75%盐酸布比卡因在腰麻硬膜外联合阻滞中的效果。方法:50例择期妇科手术患者(ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级)随机分为两组(n=25)。分别用0.75%罗哌卡因2ml和0.75%布比卡因2ml行蛛网膜下腔阻滞。观察两组感觉、运动阻滞起效及恢复时间和用药后的不良反应。结果:两组感觉阻滞起效时间、恢复时间无明显差异。运动阻滞起效时间罗哌卡因明显慢于布比卡因(P〈0.05),运动恢复时间明显快于布比卡因(P〈0.05)。结论:0.75%罗哌卡因用于腰麻能达到完善的麻醉效果,感觉阻滞与0.75%布比卡因相似,运动阻滞起效慢,但恢复迅速。 Objective: To compare the effect of ropivaeaine and huplvacaine HCI for spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Methods.. Fifty ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ patients with either 2ml 0.75% bupivacaine HCI (control group, n = 25) or 2ml 0.75% ropivaeaine HCI (study group, n = 2S) were performed spinal-epidural anaesthesia in my hospital. Appear-time and renew-time of sense and motor blockade were observed and recoded. The badness reactions were reeoded too. Results:There were no evident differences in sense blockade and renew-time between tow groups. The ropivaeaine appear-time of motor blockade is slower than the bupivacaine ( P 〈0.05) significantly. The ropivacalne renew-time of motor is swifter than the bupivacaine ( P 〈 0.05 ) significantly. Conclusion :0.75 % ropivaeaine can be used for the spinal-epidural anaesthesia with perfect in anaesthesia effect. There were no evident differences in sense blockade between two groups. The ropivacaine motor blockade was slower and renew-time was speeder.
出处 《沈阳医学院学报》 2006年第1期28-29,共2页 Journal of Shenyang Medical College
关键词 罗哌卡因 腰麻 妇科手术 布比卡因 ropivacaine spinal anaesthesia woman operation bupivacaine
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献2

  • 1刘俊杰,现代麻醉学(第2版),1997年,632页
  • 2刘俊杰,现代麻醉学(第2版),1997年,312页

共引文献234

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部