摘要
利用6种类型IPR方程,对文献[1]油藏模拟器生成数据进行了重新拟合,得出不同IPR方程在不同井斜角下的Vogel参数值。数值分析结果为:Winggins-Russell-Jennings方程拟合精度最好,Klins-Majcher方程次之,Vogel方程较差,Fetkovich方程、Harrison方程和Bendakhlia-Aziz方程最差。表明Winggins-Russell-Jennings方程和Klins-Majcher方程比Vogel方程更适用于描述不同井斜角下的IPR方程,而Fetkovich方程、Harrison方程和Bendakhlia-Aziz方程的适应性相对较差。
The Vogel parameter values of different inclinations in different IPR equations are given by using six types of IPR equations and re-matching the generated data from the reservoir simulator of Literature [1]. The values analysis shows that Winggins-Russell-Jennings equation is the best, Klins-Majcher equation is good, Vogel equation is poor, and Fetkovich, Harrison and Bendakhlia-Aziz equations are the worst in matching accuracy, indicating Winggins-Russell-Jennings equation and Klins-Majcher equation are better used for describing the IPR equation of different inclinations than Vogel equation, while Fetkovich, Harrison and Bendakhlia-Aziz equations are of poor applicability.
出处
《新疆石油地质》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第2期208-209,共2页
Xinjiang Petroleum Geology
关键词
斜井
水平井
油井动态
方程
误差
优选法
deviated well
horizontal well
well performance
equation
error
optimal choice
