摘要
当现有经济学证据的系统评价不能充分评价上市后药物的经济学情况时,需要开展原始的经济学评价研究。本文主要介绍了原始经济学评价中研究设计,成本和结果的测量,及敏感性分析的原则。总体而言,四种设计方案可用于经济学评价,不同方案各有其优缺点。结果和成本的测量方法有多种,主要根据研究要求和适用性选择不同的方法。对各种可能影响结果的因素应采用不同的分析方法进行分析。
Primary economic evaluations are needed in the case that the systematic review of existing economic evidence is not capable of informing economic profiles of marketed medicines. Following the first section of this programs, we presented the principles of designing a study, measuring costs and outcomes, and performing sensitivity analyses. Generally, four designs of economic evaluations are available to perform economic evaluations, each of which has specific strengths and weaknesses. Valuation of outcomes and costs may differ in methods, mainly based on the requirements and applicability of study. The possible factors leading to variation of results should be analyzed using analytic methods with different techniques.
出处
《中国循证医学杂志》
CSCD
2006年第3期218-223,共6页
Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词
经济学评价
上市后药物
方法
Economic evaluation Marketed medicines Methods
