期刊文献+

IBDV地方野毒株不同毒源二价灭活油乳苗免疫效果的比较研究

Efficacy Comparasion of IBDV Bivalent Oil-adjuvant Inactivated Vaccines Preparated With the Cultures of Bursal Tissues and Embryo Allantoic Liquid
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 对利用IBDV地方野毒株所制备的囊毒和胚毒二价灭活油乳苗免疫效果进行了比较研究。结果表明,所制备的囊毒灭活苗免疫效果显著优于胚毒灭活苗和活疫苗,在接种后各个时期所产生的抗体效价均显著高于其它两种疫苗(P<0.01),最高AGP效价可达4.8log2;胚苗的免疫效果虽然差于囊苗,但明显优于活疫苗,当活苗免疫组鸡血清中已无可测性抗体时,胚苗组仍具有1.0log2的AGP效价。在攻毒试验中,囊苗组鸡对IBDV标准毒、两株野毒株的攻击均100%地获得了保护;胚苗组也均可获得80%的保护,这两种由地方毒株所制备的疫苗均未呈现出对不同毒株抵抗性的不同,而活苗组对不同毒株的攻击则分别只有53.3%、40%和46.7%的保护率,呈现出一定的差异性。 The efficacy of the bivalent oil-adjuvant inactivated vaccines preparated using cultures of bursal tissues and embryo ailantoic liquid of two field isolates were detected separately.The results showed that the efficacy of vaccine prepared with bursal tissue was obviously superior to those of the other two vaccines.The titres of AGP antibody were obviously higher than those of the other vaccine post-immunization(P〈0.01),the highest AGP titre was 4.81og2.Although the efficacy of vaccine prepared with embryo allantoic liquid was not better than that of bursal vaccine,it was obviously better than that of live vaccine.Immuned chickens challenged with IBDV BC6/85 and vvlBDV isolates.100% and 80% of chickens immunized with inactivated vaccines were protectod,respectively.The resistance of two vaccines prepared with vvIBDV isolates against various IBDV had no difference,but the resistance of live vaccine against various IBDV had a little difference.
出处 《中国家禽》 北大核心 2006年第5期11-13,共3页 China Poultry
关键词 IBDV地方野毒株 囊组织 胚尿囊液 二价灭活油乳苗 IBDV isolates bursal tissues embryo allantoic liquid bivalent oil-adjuvent inactivated vaccines
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献12

  • 1陈溥言,卢春.传染性法氏囊病病毒dsRNA核酸提取[J].南京农业大学学报,1996,19(4):73-76. 被引量:17
  • 2Mundt E. Tissue culture infectivity of different strai-ns of infectious bursl disease virus if determined by distinct amino acids in VP2[J]. J Gen Virol,1999,80:2067-2076.
  • 3Yu L, Song K, Zhang Y, et al. Cloning and expression of the VP2 gene of an infectious bursal disease virus[J]. Avian Dis,2000,44(1):170-178.
  • 4Yamaguchi T, Ogawa M, Miyoshi M,et al. Sequence and phylogenetic analyses of highly virulent infectious bursal disease virus[J]. Arch Virol,1997,142(7):1441-1458.
  • 5Sharm J M, Dohms J E, Metz A L. Comparative pathogenesis of serotype 1 and variant serotype 1 isolates of infectious bursal disease and their effect on humoral and cellular immune competence of SPF chickens[J] .Avian Diseases,1989,33:112~124.
  • 6Tanimura N, Tsukamoto K, Nakamura K, et al. Association between pathogenicity of infectious bursal disease virus and viral antigen distribution detected by immunohistochemistry[J]. Avian Diseases,1995,39:9-20.
  • 7萨姆布鲁克J 弗里奇EF 曼尼阿蒂斯T 金冬雁 黎孟枫 译.分子克隆实验指南[M].第2版[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.133-136.
  • 8刘爵,刘有昌,姚炜光,周蛟,王平.传染性法氏囊病病毒变异株的致病性[J].中国兽医学报,1998,18(5):427-429. 被引量:9
  • 9曹永长,毕英佐,梁志清,林文量.超强传染性法氏囊病病毒株宿主保护抗原的分子特征[J].中国兽医学报,1998,18(6):521-526. 被引量:83
  • 10刘爵,刘尚高,周蛟.鸡传染性法氏囊病超强毒LX株的分离鉴定[J].中国兽医杂志,2000,26(5):13-15. 被引量:16

共引文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部