期刊文献+

鼻咽癌CT/MRI配准方法的临床研究 被引量:7

Clinical registration between CT and MRI of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨鼻咽癌CT/MRI的临床配准方法并评价配准效果。方法 8例未经治疗的鼻咽癌患者采用相同放疗体位和面罩固定方法,Cr、MRI扫描后全部图像经网络传输至AcQSIM4.9.2及Pinnacle3 V7.0工作站,分别由两名医师和一名物理师在AcQSIM4.9.2采用点标记法、交互法及在Pinnacle3 V7.0上采用归一化互信息法来配准。采用盲法由两名医师分别在不同工作站上目测评价,评价配准结果采用四点法:极差、差、良、很好;评价配准时间采用三点法:短时((1min)、长时(1~3min)、很长(〉3min)。结果 归一化互信息法较交互法、点标记法更为准确,配准速度最快。医生组较物理师配准更为准确,速度快,其中点标记法医生组较物理师配准更为准确,速度快,而归一化互信息法和交互法医生组与物理师配准准确性及速度相当。结论 归一化互信息法在速度和Robust上占优势,因由软件自动配准、人为因素影响较小故适合放疗计划配准应用。 Objective To explore and evaluate the different registration methods between CT and MPA of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods cr and MPd scans of 8 untreated nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients were carried out in treatment position using mask immobilization. All images were transformed and registered at Ac- QSIM4.9.2 and Pinnacle3 V 7.0 workstation by two physicians and one physicist respectively, as to the pointmarker, interactive, normalized mutual information registration. Two physicians evaluated the results and time of registration with four points based on visual evaluation and three points based on registration time were recorded and assessed as well. The four points were: worst; worse; better; best. The three points were: short time( 〈 1 min) ; long time(1 ~3 min) ; and longer time( 〉 3 min). Results Normalized mutual information registration was the method that the results and times oir registration were better than the others. The results of registration were improved by the physicians rather than the physicist, especially the point-marker method. The results of registration were similar between physicians and physicist with interactive, normalized mutual information registration. Conclusion Compared with other methods, normalized mutual information method is adapted to registration during treatment planning. Because it is automatically carried on by software and coefficient, and showing supoeriority in robust with less subiective effect, it is suggested for the registration of radiotherapeutic planning.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第2期85-88,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤 图像处理 计算机辅助 评价研究 Nasopharyngeal neoplasms Image processing, computer-assisted Evaluation studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Mah D,Steckner M,Hanlon A,et al.MRI simulation:effect of gradient distortions on three-dimensional prostate cancer plans.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,53:757-765.
  • 2Lee N,Xia P,Fischbein NJ.Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer:the UCSF experience focusing on target volume delineation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,57:49-60.
  • 3易俊林,高黎,黄晓东,李素艳,罗京伟,徐国镇.鼻咽癌放射治疗的失败模式[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2004,13(3):145-148. 被引量:89
  • 4Poon PY,Tsang VH,Munk PL.Tumor extent and T stage of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:a comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic finding.Can Assoc Radiol J,2000,51:287-295.
  • 5Lau KY,Kan WK,Sze WM,etal.Accuracy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging by magnetic resonance imaging.Australas Radiol,2004,48:14-16.
  • 6Chung NN,Ting LL,Hsu WC,et al.Impact of magnetic resonance imaging versus CT on nasopharyngeal carcinoma:primary tumor target delineation for radiotherapy.Head Neck,2004,26:241-246.
  • 7魏宝清.对比88例鼻咽癌的MRI与CT及研究茎突后间隙受累的组成[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,1996,5(2):7-10. 被引量:35
  • 8Prott FJ,Haverkamp U,Eich H,et al.Effect of distortions and asymmetry in MR images on radiotherapeutic treatment planni.ng.Int J Cancer,2000,90:46-50.
  • 9Petra A,Vanden E,Evert-Jan DP,et al.Medical image matching-A review with classification.IEEE Eng Med Biol,1993,12:26-39.
  • 10Fitzpatrick JM,West JB,Maurer CR.Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration.IEEE Trans Med Imaging,1998,17:694-702.

二级参考文献3

共引文献122

同被引文献49

引证文献7

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部